Further Websites about 9/11
The Alleged 9/11 Hijackers
Did you know that 10 of the Alleged 19 Hijackers where known to still be alive after 9/11
Essential to the deception was the story that 19 Muslim extremists hijacked four domestic flights on the morning of September 11, 2001 with the intention of flying them into predetermined targets.
But do we really know who these alleged hijackers were? Do we know they carried out any hijackings? Do we know they were even at the scenes of the crimes? In fact, as researcher Elias Davidsson demonstrates in his recent book Hijacking America’s Mind on 9/11: Counterfeiting Evidence, there is not one shred of authenticated evidence that any of the 19 men blamed for the “attacks” ever boarded any planes. And even if there were, this would not prove they participated in any hijackings. Several of the accused hijackers even turned out to be alive after 9/11, a fact that is not mentioned in the 9/11 Commission Report even though it was known long before the report was written. Also Davidsson goes into great detail pulling together evidence that there is no authenticated CCTV video of the hijackers at the departure gates (Israeli company ICTS controlled CCTV at the airports on 9/11), there are no authenticated passenger lists or boarding passes, there has been no positive identification of the hijacker's bodily remains also there are no witnesses who have seen the hijackers at the security and boarding pass checkpoints.
Researcher Jay Kolar, in his article “What We Now Know about the Alleged Hijackers,” published in The Hidden History of 9-11 (edited by Paul Zarembka), points out that then FBI director Robert Mueller has admitted that the case against the “hijackers” would never stand up in a court of law.
The FBI admitted that the IDs used by the perpetrators were high-quality fakes using identities stolen from Arab men. FBI Director Robert Mueller has admitted in public that there is actually no evidence that proves the named 9-11 hijackers were actually on the aircraft.
In an April 19, 2004 speech delivered to the Common wealth Club in San Francisco, Mueller said that the purported hijackers, in his words, “left no paper trial.” The FBI director stated flatly, "In our investigation, we have not uncovered a single piece of paper—either here in the United States or in the treasure trove of information that has turned up in Afghanistan and elsewhere that mentioned any aspect of the Sept. 11 plot." In describing Mueller’s evidence fiasco, Los Angeles Times reporters Erich Lichtblau and Josh Meyer, whose article was reprinted in The Washington Post on April 30 2004, note that: Law enforcement officials say that while they have been able to reconstruct the movements of the hijackers before the attacks all legal except for a few speeding tickets they have found no evidence of their actual plotting of the events of 9/11.
Now think about that for a moment. What Mueller admitted is that despite all the immediate pronouncements of these Arab names and that they all worked for Osama bin Laden, the FBI with all its investigatory powers did not find one single piece of evidence that actually connected these Arab men to the events of 9-11. All the FBI had were fake IDs found in suitcases left conspicuously where they could be found.
Perhaps the biggest problem with the passenger lists that have been released is that the identities of several of the alleged hijackers have changed with no explanation. We also know that several of the people on the FBI’s list were still alive after 9/11 and could not have been part of any possible hijackings. Some names were deleted and others substituted, but even some of the new names belonged to people who turned out to be alive. Kolar reports that at least 10 of the current list of 19 were still alive after 9/11. Two of the alleged hijackers were supposed to have boarded Flight 77, Salem al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Midhhar, and they turned up alive after 9/11.
In his book, Davidsson points out that former Drug Enforcement Agency administrator and former Commissioner of U.S. Customs and Border Protection, Robert Bonner, testified before the 9/11 Commission that he had been handed a sheet containing the names of the 19 probable hijackers by 11 a.m. on 9/11. The problem is that this is well before the U.S. military had even confirmed which planes had been hijacked. Where did he get this list? How could he know the names of the alleged hijackers just 2 hours after the event, even before any investigation?
There are simply no witnesses who can state that any hijackers actually boarded any planes. No ticket takers, no security personnel, no one. In fact, there is no one who makes a credible claim to have seen any of them at boarding gates or security checkpoints either.
Had 19 hijackers boarded four planes, they should each have been caught on camera dozens of times as they moved through the terminals. But they are no videos only one of Mohammed Atta which we know was at Portland Airport.
Flight 175: The list originally contained four names but a fifth, Mohand al-Sheri, was added later. But he turned up alive and living in Saudi Arabia, according to the Saudi embassy in Washington. Hamza al-Gamdi was supposed to have been a hijacker on Flight 175, but his family came forward to state that the photo released did not resemble him although the name and birth date matched.
Flight 93: Another who turned up alive was Saeed al-Ghamdi. He told David Harrison of The Telegraph (U.K. Newspaper) that he was shocked to see his name on the list of hijackers and that he had spent the previous 10 months in Tunis learning to fly an Airbus. According to the BBC, al-Ghamdi had also been interviewed by the London-based Arab newspaper Asharq Al Awsat.
Here’s an excerpt from David Harrison’s Telegraph story entitled: ‘Revealed: The Men with Stolen Identities’: “Their names were flashed around the world as suicide hijackers who carried out the attacks on America. But yesterday four innocent men told how their identities had been stolen. The men, all from Saudi Arabia – spoke of their shock at being mistakenly named by the FBI as suicide terrorists. None of the four was in the United States on September 11 and all are alive in their home country. The Telegraph obtained the first interviews with the men since they learnt that they were on the FBI’s list of hijackers who died in the crashes in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania. All four said they were outraged to be identified as terrorists. One has never been to America and another is a Saudi Airlines pilot who was on a training course in Tunisia at the time of the attacks”.
Another alleged hijacker, Ahmed al-Nami, told Harrison after 9/11 that he was shocked to see his name on the list of hijackers, adding that, “I had never even heard of Pennsylvania.” He stated that he had been working as an administrative supervisor for Saudi Arabian Airlines.
Why would Osama Bin Laden, attempting to cover his tracks, steal the identities of fellow Saudi Arabians? What would be the point? Why go through the trouble of stealing identities that would point back to you. Why not steal Greek identities, or Brazilian identities, or Turkish ones? A much more logical conclusion is that non-Arabs (Mossad) stole these identities as part of a “false flag” operation designed to point the blame at Arabs, and Saudi Arabia in particular.
Watch this revealing professional documentary which is part of the 5 hour documentary of the movie September 11th the New Pearl Harbour'. This part is 40 minutes and shows you it was impossible for these alleged hijackers to fly passenger airliners into their targets on 9/11.
John Lear's 2008 affidavit supported a lawsuit brought by Dr. Morgan Reynolds challenging the government theory "as to how and why the World Trade Center buildings collapsed on 9/11." Although the lawsuit was dismissed "with prejudice," Lear's affidavit provides striking practical and technical details explaining how difficult it is in practice to steer a passenger plane from cruising altitude of 35,000 ft into a tall city building. Lear believes it "would have been impossible ... for anyone with little or no time in a Boeing 767 ... to have taken over and then flown the aircraft at high speed, then descend to below a thousand feet above sea level and then flown a course to impact the twin towers." He says that even he couldn't do it on his first try.
“Even on a clear day a novice pilot would be wholly incapable of taking control and turning a Boeing 767 towards New York because of his total lack of experience and situational awareness under these conditions. The alleged hijackers were not 'instrument rated' and controlled high altitude flight requires experience in constantly referring to and cross-checking attitude, altitude and speed instruments. Using the distant horizon to fly 'visually' ... is virtually impossible particularly at the cruising speed of the Boeing 767. To propose that an alleged hijacker with limited experience could get a Boeing 767 lined up with a 208 foot wide target and keep it lined up and hold his altitude at exactly 800 feet while being aurally bombarded with the clacker is beyond the realm of possibility. ... At the peak of my proficiency as a pilot I know that I could not have done it on the first pass. And for two alleged hijackers, with limited experience to have hit the twin towers dead center on September 11, 2001 is total fiction. It could not happen." John Lear – 40 years a Pilot
The story that 19 Muslims named by the FBI were responsible for hijacking four airliners and killing themselves in the process simply cannot stand up to examination. In fact we know for a fact that it is false.
The Miracle Passports
In trying to frame Al Qaeda for 9/11 the American government came up with some laughable scenarios. Now this one defies the laws of physics but according to New York police commissioner Bernard Kerik the passport of Satam Al Suqami (he supposedly was one of the hijackers on one of the planes that hit the north tower) survived the fireball in the tower when the plane hit and was picked up by a civilian and handed into the NYPD. Now when the towers collapsed they mostly turned to dust, steel frames turned to dust, toilets and sinks turned to dust and only DNA from about 1000 of the 2996 victims in the twin towers was found but we are supposed to believe that a passport from one of the hijackers survived. What nonsense, does any sensible person believe that? The NYPD police commissioner Bernard Kerik was a crook because in 2007 he was indicted on 16 counts of fraud and conspiracy and failing to report a $250,000 loan from billionaire Israeli tycoon Eitan Wertheimer from when Kerik visited Israel in 2001.
Below a clip from CNN on the day of 9/11 which suggests that a hijacker passport was found. As we know from the 9/11 media section, CNN is owned by Zionist Jews.
Who are Al Qaeda?
The Mujahedeen with Osama Bin Laden was funded, trained and created by the CIA to fight Russia in the war with Afghanistan in the 1980’s. This Mujahedeen then morphed into Al Qaeda. Al Qaeda actually means the ‘Base’ which came from the database of names of Mujahedeen fighters who fought against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980s. Mossad and other organizations could be responsible for the terrorist acts falsely attributed to Al Qaeda. Those who say they are “Al Qaeda spokesmen” are Israeli actors.
Adam Gadahn, pictured above, is the so called Al Qaida spokesperson who released videos of himself preaching Al Qaeda goals and ideology on numerous occasions. The FBI even has him on their most wanted terrorists list. It turns out he is a Jew named Adam Pearlman, from California. Adam's grandfather, Carl Pearlman, was a prominent surgeon and on the Board of Directors of the Anti-Defamation League.
Another Jew who as disguised himself as a Muslim to convince the world that Muslims and Al Qaeda are a threat was Joseph Cohen (from a Jewish New York family). He named himself Yousef al-Khattab, and he made the fake radical ‘Islamist’ website called Revolution Muslim.
I believe Al Qaeda is a group of mercenary fighters that fight for the goals of the Israeli and American governments. Whenever America is in a war Al Qaeda are there fighting on their behalf. When America was fighting in Bosnia, Iraq and Libya we found Al Qaeda fighting on the side of America. Al Qaeda is also used to make the western world fear and hate Muslims. I would also suggest that Al Qaeda has now become Isis or Isil and they only attack Iraq and Syria (Israel’s biggest enemies) and they never attack Israel.
People need to know that the Muslim terror threat is a big lie which comes from the Zionist Jewish media. Let’s look at some facts from the FBI. The FBI’s statistics on terrorist incidents between 1980 and 2005 in the United States says that 5 percent of terror attacks were committed by communists, 6 percent by Muslim extremists, 7 percent by Jewish extremists, 24 percent by radical leftists, 42 percent by Latinos and 16 percent is listed as ‘other.’ So the FBI stats say there is more Jewish terrorists than Muslim and don’t forget the Muslims were framed for 9/11 and probably many other’s that we don’t know. The Muslim terror threat is a lie to justify Israel’s and the West’s ‘war on terror’ in the Middle East.
Shortly before his untimely death, former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook told the House of Commons that "Al Qaeda" is not really a terrorist group but a database of international mujahidin and arms smugglers used by the CIA and Saudis to funnel guerrillas, arms, and money into Soviet-occupied Afghanistan...."The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the 'devil' only in order to drive the 'TV watcher' to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the US and the lobbyists for the US war on terrorism are only interested in making money.” Robin Cook.
Robin Cook mysteriously died of a heart attack while out on a walk with his wife. But despite the media’s remarkably limited and unquestioning coverage of the matter, there were irregularities around the circumstances of Cook’s death. Cook was rushed to hospital by helicopter without his wife, who was not permitted to accompany him, even though he was still alive at that point. The helicopter, according to newspaper reports, had taken 30 minutes to arrive at the scene. As her husband was flown off, Mrs Cook was left to walk all the way back down the Scottish mountainside on her own. By the time she got to Raigmore Hospital in Inverness, her husband had already been pronounced dead.