The Pentagon Attack

Did you know that there is more CCTV cameras around the Pentagon than any building in America and yet there is no CCTV footage of any passenger airliner crashing into the Pentagon.

The official story says American Airlines Flight 77, flown from Dulles International Airport was hijacked over Ohio. At 9:37 am Flight 77 was crashed into the west side of the Pentagon (the headquarters of the American military) in Arlington County, Virginia, which led to a partial collapse of the west side.

How could a commercial plane enter the Pentagon’s “no-fly zone” without being seen or not shot down by the Pentagons own surface to air missiles?

Also why wasn’t this so called plane intercepted by F16’s before it reached what was probably the best-defended building in the world?

As Dr. David Ray Griffin and others have pointed out, military jet interceptions of wayward passenger jets is a routine occurrence. In the year before 9/11, from September 2000 through June 2001, there were 67 such interceptions by military Jets but there were none on 9/11/01.  Why?

About 80 CCTV videos from buildings and businesses around the Pentagon were taken away by the FBI. So if a plane did hit the Pentagon then these videos would show that so why doesn't the government show this proof?  The American government says it is a conspiracy theory to suggest no plane hit the Pentagon but they cannot show us proof that a plane did hit the pentagon so we must assume that they are involved in a cover up.  The reason the videos were confiscated was because they would show that no Plane hit the Pentagon.

The American government claims the fire in the Pentagon was so hot that the virtually indestructible titanium engines were melted, enormous metal wings incinerated, detachable vertical tail fins swallowed whole, seats and luggage consumed, every inch of metal framing obliterated, landing gear gone, a whole enormous Boeing 757 essentially vaporized into molten rubble and dust. Yet they were able to extract DNA of 184 individual human beings from the wreckage.  What nonsense.

Listen to Jamie Mcintyre in the video below, CNN’s senior Pentagon correspondent at the time, was at the Pentagon shortly after it was hit. Here’s what he reported:

“From my close-up inspection, there is no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon.

Look at the photos below, 


You can see the small fire in the centre of the Pentagon but either side of the fire the building is still intact and it would not be intact if a 757 airliner had flew into it.  On the inner wall of the Pentagon there is an exit hole were we are told the nose of the plane hit.  But how is that possible when there is no entry hole where the plane allegedly entered as the photos show. 

Pentagon fire.jpg
Pentagon fire2.jpg

Below one hour later that part of the centre of the building collapsed.

Pentagon fire3 small.jpg

Below is a photo taken shortly after the apparent crash of Flight 77? Notice there are no signs of debris from a crashed airliner.  Notice the perfect condition of the lawn.  If a Boeing 757 had hit the Pentagon at almost ground level it would have left gouge marks in the grass for sure, but there are none.


“The government story that they handed us about 9/11 is total BS plain and simple.  There was absolutely no possibility that flight 77 could have descended 7,000 ft. in 2 minutes, all the while performing a steep 280 degree banked turn before crashing into the Pentagon’s first floor wall without touching the lawn”, - Captain Russ Wittenberg, U.S Airforce retired commercial pilot, flew for Pan Am and United Airlines for 35 years.

Watch this revealing professional documentary about the Pentagon which is part of the 5 hour documentary of the movie 'September 11th the New Pearl Harbour'.  This part is 24 minutes long and shows you it was almost impossible for a passenger airliner to have crashed into the Pentagon.











The following statement is from Captain Dan Hanley at

I am Captain Dan Hanley, an American citizen who has resided in Islamabad, Pakistan for over 10 years. I currently serve as the director and international public spokesperson of a global grassroots effort called ‘9/11 Pilot Whistleblowers’, whose purpose is to show that there were no Muslim hijackers at the controls of the 9/11 aircraft but that they were electronically hijacked through employment of a system called the uninterruptible autopilot that enables a remote source to take complete control of the aircraft autopilot and flight management computer and guide it to its target destination. Once engaged, the pilots cannot disconnect the system.

Our ultimate goal is to recruit highly trained and experienced civilian, military, and airline pilots alike, both active and retired, from around the world who would be willing to examine the available evidence and testify on camera to the difficulty of the manoeuvres supposedly executed by 19 Muslim hijackers on 9/11, such that even the highly trained pilot testifying could not have flown the given profiles on that fateful day.  We are also looking for experienced pilots’ input in identifying the skills and aptitudes which pilots must master, distinguishing them from persons who lack such training.

An example of this is given by the purported profile flown by alleged Muslim hijacker Hani Hanjour who supposedly piloted American Airlines flight 77 that allegedly struck the Pentagon on 9/11.  The aircraft was reported to have conducted a descending and accelerating 270 degree corkscrew turn from 7000 feet west of the Pentagon to arrive precisely at ground level to strike the Office of Naval Intelligence at nearly 500 miles per hour.  This manoeuvre was replicated in a flight simulator. Highly experienced pilots could not perform this manoeuvre on successive attempts without crashing and yet, according to the official narrative, Hani Hanjour accomplished this amazing aerial feat on the first attempt with minimal aircraft experience training in light Cessna aircraft having only a few hundred hours of total flight time. - Captain Dan Hanley

In an interview with Parade Magazine in October 2001 (of which a transcript was posted on the U.S. Department of Defense website,, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld was asked “How did a war targeting civilians arrive on our homeland with seemingly no warning?” Rumsfeld replied:

“There were lots of warnings… It is a truth that a terrorist can attack any time, any place, using any technique and it’s physically impossible to defend at every time and every place against every conceivable technique. Here we’re talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filled with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center. The only way to deal with this problem is by taking the battle to the terrorists, wherever they are, and dealing with them”.

Rumsfeld’s interview where he mentions the missile hitting the Pentagon on the department of the defenses website can be seen at the link below.


In an interview in September 2006 with CNN’s Miles O’Brien, former 9/11 Commissioner Member, Timothy Roemer, says that a missile caused the damage to the Pentagon and then quickly corrects himself to line up with the official story.

O’Brien: “At any point during this day were you just, in a very base way, afraid?”

Roemer: “There was — there were many times, Miles, that you were afraid. You were — you were worried, especially when I was standing in front of the Pentagon that night, seeing one of our fortresses pried open by a missile, an airplane, thinking about the number of people that probably died on the plane and on the ground…”

Click on the video below to see the above exchange between O’Brien and Roemer:

Watch the video below, which shows a missile striking the Pentagon.  Whatever it is it ain't no Passenger Airliner that is for sure.

Major General Stubblebine said that after investigation – including measuring the impact site with the size of the jet – it couldn’t have been a plane that hit the Pentagon.  He concluded it was a missile that smashed into the Pentagon, citing “evidence” that the remnants of a turbine from a rocket were left in the impact zone.  He said in the same interview that images that allegedly back up his incredible claims were swiftly removed from the internet and replaced with doctored pictures.  Stubblebine supported the idea that the Twin Towers were brought down in a controlled demolition.  Albert Newton Stubblebine was commanding general of the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command (INSCOM) from 1981 to 1984.

Below are some notes from General Stubblebine interview including a partial transcript?

Stubblebine saw a photo of the Pentagon showing the hole in the Pentagon supposedly made by a Boeing 757.  “Something’s wrong. There is something wrong with this picture…”

8:30 “Well there was something wrong. And, so I analyzed it not just photographically, I did measurements… I checked the plane, the length of the nose, where the wings were… I took measurements of the Pentagon – the depth of the destruction in the Pentagon.”

9:05 “Conclusion: airplane did not make that hole.”

9:10” I went public at the time. I am the highest ranking officer, I believe, that has ever gone public… The official story was not true.”

9:25 “I was very careful to not say what it was because I couldn’t prove it. I was careful to say that it was not the airplane that did that, because I can prove that it was not the airplane.”

“There was an exercise that was designed for the air defense systems that was an attack on the towers by airplanes.  Isn’t that strange that we had an exercise that mimicked what really happened?  Strange that we had planned an exercise that was exactly what happened. And, at the same time, the air defense systems were turned off.  Don’t you find that strange? I find that really strange?” - General Stubblebine

Below a link to General Stubblebines interview:

Witnesses have claimed that they head “a shrill noise like the noise of a fighter-bomber”, but nothing like the noise of a civilian aircraft.

Eye-witnesses have said that they saw “something like a cruise missile with wings” or a small flying object

Lon Rains, who was an Editor for Space News at the time, happened to be driving his car near the Pentagon when it was hit by a missile on 9/11. In an article titled Eyewitness: The Pentagon, published on June 30, 2005, Rains wrote:

“That morning, like many others, the traffic slowed to a crawl just in front of the Pentagon. With the Pentagon to the left of my van at about 10 o’clock on the dial of a clock, I glanced at my watch to see if I was going to be late for my appointment. At that moment I heard a very loud, quick whooshing sound that began behind me and stopped suddenly in front of me and to my left. In fractions of a second I heard the impact and an explosion. The next thing I saw was the fireball. I was convinced it was a missile. It came in so fast it sounded nothing like an airplane”.

Let’s listen to the testimony of an eyewitness who was in the part of the Pentagon that got attacked and lived to tell about it. April Gallup worked on the West Side of the Pentagon.  She said:

“I thought it was a bomb. I was buried in the rubble and my first thought was for my son. I crawled around until I found his stroller. It was crumpled all into a ball and I was then very afraid. But then I heard his voice and managed to locate him.  Outside they were treating people on the grassy lawn. But all the ambulances had left, so a man, who was near the scene stepped up, put us in his private car, and drove us to the hospital. The Images are burned into my brain”.

Mrs. Gallup escaped out of the exact impact of where supposedly Flight 77 hit and came out onto the lawn.

April Gallup was then visited in hospital by men in suits who basically told her to stick to the plane hit the Pentagon story and to take money.  Hmm sounds very suspicious.


Gallup continued:

“They never identified themselves or even said which agency they worked for. But I know they were not newsmen because I learned that the Pentagon had told news reporters not to cover survivors’ stories or they would not get more stories out of there. The men who visited all said they couldn’t tell me what to say; they only wanted to make suggestions. But then they told me what to do, which was take the money (Victim Compensation Fund) and shut up. They also kept insisting that a plane hit the building. But I was there and I never saw a plane or even debris from a plane. I figure the plane story is there to brainwash people”.

Mrs. Gallup states, “I hadn’t seen any evidence of metal, airplane seats, no luggage, nothing that would give me the indication that it was a plane that hit the building.  I didn’t have any jet fuel over my body.  There was nothing on the inside that would give me any indication that there was a plane on that particular day that hit the building.  No one else saw in that area where I was, located saw any parts of any planes or luggage or baggage, or anything of that nature”.

“Washington, D.C. is THE most restricted airspace in the world and there are several United States Air Force Bases in the immediate vicinity that enforce the restrictions. There is NO WAY any sort of aircraft could invade the D.C. airspace and actually hit the Pentagon, which is the command center of the U.S. military deployed worldwide. Any incoming “bogey” would be spotted on radar, armed supersonic fighter jets would be scrambled in minutes and that “bogey” would be shot down before being allowed to remain on a course headed for the Nation’s Capital. All of the fighters nationwide should have been airborne, we were already under attack and everybody knew it! The WTC Twin Towers had both been hit! And what was up with the hidden surface to air missile installations that exist in the D.C. area? How did a “bogey” get through them? There was something very fishy about all this!” - Charles Maultsby, American Researcher, Author of ‘Who Should Go Down in History’,

It is also interesting to note that most of the people killed at the Pentagon were budget analysts and accountants who were investigating the 2.3 trillion dollars that had gone missing from the Pentagon funds according to Secretary of Defence at the time of 9/11 Donald Rumsfeld who said this the day before 9/11.  The missile that hit the Pentagon actually hit the room were the analysts were investigating the missing billions and killed over 20 of these analysts.  Who managed these Pentagon funds at the time, no other than Zionist Jew Dov Zakheim.  Were these missing funds used for the whole 9/11 operation by the Zionist Jews?

“Whenever “trillions” go missing from the Pentagon, DOD or any other organ of the U.S. Federal Government, it’s always announced by Jewish comptrollers, accountants or other administrators who have no explanation for the unparalleled grand larcenies. Even those directly responsible for these grand thefts somehow completely escape prosecution or avoid scrutiny from even the IG. In this way, the Jewish banksters have conditioned the American people to accept “missing trillions” as business as usual whenever it concerns US government bookkeeping. This particular type of peacetime plundering and pillaging of the American people represents the largest ongoing heist in world history” – From