Where Planes even used on 9/11?

 

Did you know that there was no physical evidence of any plane wreckage found or black boxes at Ground Zero or the Pentagon  or Shanksville?

How could two Boeing 767 jetliners, which are essentially big hollow aluminium tubes, cut through multiple steel girders and concrete floors to completely penetrate the massive steel towers, with no deceleration visible, and disappear without a trace, with no plane wreckage visible in the holes and no wreckage fall to the ground below the impact zone? Any video that shows an aluminium airplane with a fibreglass nose cone gliding through a steel and concrete building violates Newton’s Laws of Motion.

Under the Plane2.JPG
911 plane2.jpg
No planes.jpg
911-no-plane-wreckage.jpg
Birds trash plane.JPG
Birds trash plane2.JPG
hologram.JPG

Below is an 18 minute excerpt from Ace Baker’s 2012 film 9/11 The Great American Psy-Opera showing how the plane images where faked.

Below more videos showing the impossible physics of flight 175 that struck the South Tower

John Lear, the son of Learjet inventor, Bill Lear, has given his expert evidence that it would have been physically impossible for Boeing 767s, like Flights AA11 and UA175 to have hit the Twin Towers on 9/11, particularly when flown by inexperienced pilots.  John Lear should know because the retired airline captain and former CIA pilot has over 19,000 hours of flight time and has flown over 100 different types of planes during his 40 years of flying.

Lear states “No Boeing 767 airliners hit the Twin Towers as fraudulently alleged by the government, media, NIST and its contractors” he stated in the affidavit.

“Such crashes did not occur because they are physically impossible as depicted, for the following reasons: in the case of UAL 175 going into the south tower, a real Boeing 767 would have begun ‘telescoping’ when the nose hit the 14 inch steel columns which are 39 inches on centre”.

“The vertical and horizontal tail would have instantaneously separated from the aircraft, hit the steel box columns and fallen to the ground”.

“The engines when impacting the steel columns would have maintained their general shape and either fallen to the ground or been recovered in the debris of the collapsed building”.

“No Boeing 767 could attain a speed of 540 mph at 1000 feet above sea level”.

“No significant part of the Boeing 767 or engine could have penetrated the 14 inch steel columns and 37 feet beyond the massive core of the tower without part of it falling to the ground”.

The debris of the collapse should have contained massive sections of the Boeing 767, including 3 engine cores weighing approximately 9000 pounds apiece which could not have been hidden. Yet there is no evidence of any of these massive structural components from either 767 at the WTC. Such complete disappearance of 767s is impossible.

9/11 activist, Morgan Reynolds, author and chief economist in the Bush administration (2001-2002), helps explain why a jet plane could not be swallowed up by a steel tower. The fuselage of an airplane is relatively fragile and is not built to penetrate a tall steel building. "With only minor hyperbole," he writes, a plane's fuselage is essentially "a hollow aluminium tube." Compared to the weight of the building -- half a million tons-vs the weight of the plane - 140 tons - "the plane, of course, would be crushed.

This suggests a physical impossibility since a building struck by a passenger jet would not hit the building and remain undamaged.  A real airplane couldn't have sliced through a building with a reinforced concrete flooring, with 47 steel support beams. A jet's wing can't slice through a steel building like a hot knife through butter.

A plane flying into a WTC tower should break up, shatter and scatter pieces everywhere.

Listen to John Lear in the video below.

This is an excellent article with a huge amount of evidence, titled '9\11 Plane Hoax - The proof that no real planes crashed on 9/11', on the website below.

https://911planeshoax.com