• Hardtruth

An Australian Engineer Speaks Out - The Many Lies & Mysteries of Covid-19

Updated: Nov 28

I remember when one or two of my friends were telling me sometime in 2021 about the origins of the pandemic and the hidden dangers of the vaccines. I didn’t take them too seriously, thinking that they had gone a tad too far down the conspiratorial road.

However, out of a mixture of curiosity and duty to myself, I decided to do some research – with the view that I’d be able to determine that they’d been victims of too much-sensationalised information.

Given that I used to head up the R&D division of a $700-million organisation, and that I’ve managed a wide variety of literally hundreds of corporate projects, I figured that it was a challenge that I could take on. Also, given that I have an engineering PhD that has helped me think critically, and that I’m very much a “show me the facts” type of guy, I figured that it wouldn’t be difficult to put any and all crazy conspiracies to bed.

After all, the prevailing message was very clear and consistent from our politicians, health advisors, expert government bodies, the MSM (Mainstream Media) and other experts which was:

Covid is a pandemic

The vaccine is safe, developed in record time

We need to be locked down and vaxxed for our safety.”

It was a major, global event, but it all seemed pretty simple. Conspiracy – I don’t think so!

What I hadn’t realised back in August 2021 was that I had stumbled upon something that was so conspiratorial, widespread and ingenious in terms of its dark intents it subsequently left me day after day moving from a point of uneasiness to being increasingly disturbed as a result of what I was uncovering.

In the process of getting to the bottom of the whole Covid/Vax thing I waded through more than 700 papers, videos, opinion pieces and articles. I talked to numerous medical professionals like nurses, doctors and paramedics, and I waded through data, LOTS OF IT. Perhaps most crucially, I did deep dives at the data behind the data that was bombarding us daily as gospel – which took a lot of digging. In the process I realised that very little, in fact almost nothing of significance that we were officially being told by the government or the MSM was remotely true. And not everyone that I talked to had the same story, so that led to more digging to get to the truth.

Anyhow, as time progressed I came upon such voluminous amounts of information that I decided to take time off work (which stretched to a whole month) – right in the process of building a new business that I’d planned to launch ahead of my 50th birthday; instead, I found myself devoting 18-hour days almost non-stop to get to the bottom of what became increasingly like a disaster movie.

At this point, let me say that I am NOT offering any advice. I’m NOT saying that everything that I’ve read, referenced or quoted will have complete accuracy. It would take years to check the contents and the veracity of every single data and information source; that is the nature of science and discovery.

I’ve decided to lay out this paper in the form of a series of Why? questions – since there are A LOT of things that did not make sense for me if the aims of our government leaders were looking out for their people.

I expect that much of the content in this document will need updating within literally one week of reading it, since the latest data that is coming from literally dozens of sources, including frontline workers and whistle-blowers, many of whom have sprung up during the pandemic. Almost none of this information is available from the heavily censored Fact Checking Big Tech, MSM or Big Pharma funded medical journals.

It’s worth stating that searches on Google – who has shares connected with Big Pharma, makes the task a little trickier since Google will ‘fact check’ things according to Google’s truth; alternative browsers such as DuckDuckGo can assist with this issue.

I’ve had this document reviewed by several senior medical practitioners who were each extremely well read and exceptionally knowledgeable regarding all things Covid.

I would also attest to the fact that Big Pharma is a brilliantly organised, highly connected trillion-dollar industry connected to Big Tech and advisory institutions – making it more difficult to determine the facts. However, voluminous amounts of good, credible information can be found if you are just able to follow the breadcrumbs and good neutral sources.

The Why? Questions 1. The Mysterious Disappearing Flu

Why is it that the official government number of influenza deaths in Australia in 2021 is ZERO, and that there has not been a single flu death recorded since April 2020? And that the number of previous flu deaths in Australia are coincidentally similar to the recorded Covid deaths?

Why is it that the number of Flu Cases (interestingly, whose symptoms are similar to Covid) in the US declined by 99.5 % during 2020?

I’ve checked the figures from the official government web sites, since I at first thought that this was fake news.

There was NO second wave of covid-19 between September 2020 and April 2021. All they did was rebrand flu deaths as covid deaths to keep the fear going so that you would take the vaccine.

Influenza, aka “the flu,” infected 35 million Americans in 2018-19, according to the Centers For Disease Control. Those numbers included 491,000 hospitalizations and 34,200 deaths. The 2017-18 flu season featured 45 million infections, 810,000 hospitalizations and 61,000 deaths. The CDC estimated upwards of 56 million illnesses, 740,000 hospitalizations and 62,000 deaths for the 2019-20 flu season.

The CDC is reporting a total of 1,710 total flu infections (see link below) in the United States from September 27, 2020 to April 3, 2021.


Meanwhile the CDC is reporting over 31 million “COVID-19” cases in the United States since the disease started in March 2020. Or shall we say, since they rebranded the flu as covid-19.

It is obvious that the flu does not just disappear after thousands of years. The mainstream media want us to believe that masks and social distancing have stopped the flu but they don’t stop covid even though they have the same symptoms.


From all-cause mortality, we can estimate something approaching of the true COVID 19 mortality figure. Research by the Italian Ministry of Health found that around 12% of recorded Covid 19 deaths in Italy could be accurately described deaths by Covid. Similarly, researchers at the U.S. Centre for Disease Control (CDC) found that around 6% of COVID 19 reported deaths were unequivocally attributable to the disease. 2. Masks

Why is it that we must wear masks whenever mask manufacturers state that they provide no protection against Covid (and that they are Single use only)?

Why do governments insist on wearing masks, whenever the most comprehensive analysis of mask effectiveness from 65 publications and 44 experimental studies show that masks are actually HARMFUL to human health – with a range of negative aspects cited as being the following:

Increase in dead space volume Increase in breathing resistance Increase in blood carbon dioxide Decrease in blood oxygen saturation Increase in heart rate Decrease in cardiopulmonary capacity Feeling of exhaustion Increase in respiratory rate Difficulty breathing and shortness of breath Headache Dizziness Feeling of dampness and heat Drowsiness (qualitative neurological deficits) Decrease in empathy perception Impaired skin barrier function with acne, itching and skin lesions? 3. Why, when studies have been shown that wearing masks causes a range of harmful psychological and societal issues, does the government mandate the wearing of them?

There is zero clear evidence of the benefits of masks to the face nappy wearer or to others. They are simply being worn and used as a visible symbol of compliance to those who are controlling this.

There is increasing evidence of the harms caused by increased CO2 inhalation as well as toxins in the masks for the wearer.

47 studies confirm ineffectiveness of masks for COVID and 32 more confirm their negative health effects


Do Face Masks Work? 8 Peer-Reviewed Studies



Are Face Masks Effective? The Evidence.

https://swprs.org/face-masks-and-covid-the-evidence/ Peer-reviewed research concludes face masks are useless and dangerous


3. PCR Test

Why are we using the PCR test to determine whether someone has Covid or not? The PCR test kits that are used in numerous countries have been found to be extremely unreliable from multiple studies and laboratory professionals; and also the PCR test kits used in many nations are purported to be unable to differentiate between Covid and influenza?

Why are we counting Covid cases at an amplification test cycle frequency in the testing kit that is very high, above levels recommended by Dr. Fauci, so that it produces significant numbers of false positives, leading to the assumption that Covid case numbers are significantly higher than they actually are? And why did the WHO sit on this information for months before going public?

Why are we using the PCR test to determine whether someone has Covid or not, when the inventor of the PCR test stated that the PCR test is not meant to be used as a diagnostic test and certainly not at the significantly elevated number of cycles that it is being used at – since it will produce erroneous results?

On 17 January 2020, as part of its recommended protocols for RT-PCR tests, the World Health Organization published the Corman-Drosten paper, ‘Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR’. These protocols were adopted and repeated across the world, including in the UK. On 16 March, the National Health Service, in its ‘Guidance and standard operating procedure: COVID-19 virus testing in NHS laboratories’, recommended a cycle threshold of 45, with anything above 40 to be regarded as a ‘confirmed’ positive. On 28 September 2020, it was estimated that, at even 35 cycles of amplification, 97 per cent of the positives in an RT-PCR test are false. Despite this, this fundamentally flawed test has been accepted without question, adopted and repeated without commentary by every medical body in the UK, and used by the Government to fabricate the vast number of so-called ‘cases’ of COVID-19 on which the lockdowns and restrictions have been built with nothing more than traces of a dead virus.

In the New York Times, experts compiled three datasets with officials from the states of Massachusetts, New York and Nevada and their conclusion was that up to 90% of the people who tested positive did not carry a virus. In Massachusetts, between 85 and 90% of people who tested positive in July 2020 with an amplification cycle of 40 would have been considered negative with an amplification cycle of 30. And yet, all these people had to isolate themselves, with all the dramatic psychological and economic consequences, while they were not sick and probably not contagious at all.

The test is telling healthy people that there are sick when they are not but they are classed as a case and go into the covid statistics. In reality you should only be a case if you are ill and need hospital treatment but if they did that they would not get enough cases to lock us down so they have to lie by saying healthy people are sick.

if someone is tested by PCR as positive when a threshold of 35 cycles or higher is used (as is the case in most laboratories in Europe & the US), the probability that said person is actually infected is less than 3%, the probability that said result is a false positive is 97% (Pieter Borger, Bobby Rajesh Malhotra, Michael Yeadon, Clare Craig, Kevin McKernan, et al, Critique of Drosten Study)

The PCR test is being used extensively to hike up the numbers with a view to justifying lockdown’s with devastating social and economic impacts including the engineered bankruptcy of tourism, air travel and small businesses, pubs, clubs, restaurants, gym etc.

The UK NHS run the PCR test at 40 to 45 CT which means over 95% of 'cases' are false positives meaning they are totally healthy and have no virus.

See extensive research into the fraudulent PCR test with pictures and videos at my link below.


The following extract is from Discovery DSalud’s article titled ‘The scam has been confirmed: PCR does not detect SARS-CoV-2’.

Discovery DSalud is a publishing company entirely constituted by independent health professionals without any affiliation or relationship with political, religious or any economic group.

The article goes on to state the following:

“The genetic sequences used in PCRs to detect suspected SARS-CoV-2 and to diagnose cases of illness and death attributed to Covid-19 are present in dozens of sequences of the human genome itself and in those of about a hundred microbes. And that includes the initiators or primers, the most extensive fragments taken at random from their supposed "genome" and even the so-called "target genes" allegedly specific to the "new coronavirus". The test is worthless and all "positive" results obtained so far should be scientifically invalidated and communicated to those affected; and if they are deceased, to their relatives. Stephen Bustin, one of the world's leading experts on PCR, in fact says that under certain conditions anyone can test positive!”

This means the PCR test can pick up dead viral fragments from past cold’s or flu and then claim you are positive for Covid-19 and then claim you have a deadly disease and need to self-isolate.

The article goes on to say:

‘We have been warning you since March: you cannot have specific tests for a virus without knowing the components of the virus you are trying to detect. And the components cannot be known without having previously isolated/purified that virus. Since then we continue to accumulate evidence that no one has isolated SARS-CoV-2 and, more importantly, that it can never be isolated for the reasons we explained last month (read the report "Can you prove that there are pathogenic viruses?" on our website -www.dsalud.com-). And in the present report we are going to offer new data that show that RT-PCR does not detect the so called SARS-CoV-2 as it is known, but fragments of human RNA and those of numerous microbes. We have already explained the numerous problems that RT-PCR poses, recognized by organizations or governments such as the WHO or the CDC and by prestigious international experts such as Dr. Stephen Bustin who considers both the arbitrariness of establishing criteria for results and the choice of the number of cycles to be nonsense because they can lead to anyone testing positive.’

‘The consequence of all that we have just explained is clear and immediate: THERE IS NO VALID TEST TO DETECT SARS-COV-2, neither antibody or antigen tests nor RT-PCR. And we included those based on the supposed gene that codes for the S1 or spike protein. And that means that.ALL THE NUMBERS OF "CASES", "INFECTED", “SICK", "Asymptomatic" OR "DEAD DUE TO COVID-19" LACK A SCIENTIFIC BASE AND ALL “POSITIVES” ARE FALSE POSITIVES, something that should be communicated immediately to those affected and those responsible should be held accountable’.

The DSalud article can be downloaded below

PCR scam-has-been-confirmed-Dsalud
Download PDF • 2.09MB

4. Vax Injuries and Deaths – what we’re not being told re the numbers

Why, if the vaccines are safe, are Australian nurses so concerned about what they are seeing in relation to vaccine injuries and deaths that they have started a site on Telegram called Frontline Workers Speak Out which in less than 2 weeks amassed over 38,000 subscribers and more than 80 whistle-blowers who have reported significant increases in both injuries post-jab, and deaths in both patients and staff?

Why are hundreds of Australian nurses and doctors from the above site coming forward? And why are thousands of frontline workers in many countries coming forward, at the risk of losing their careers in some cases, with claims that almost none of the injuries and deaths post-jab are being recorded as linked to the vaccine?

Why, if the vaccines are safe, was the Facebook page of America's ABC inundated with over 250,000 stories of vaccine related tragic injuries and deaths within the space of just 5 days -- when it asked for tragic unvaccinated Covid stories (before they removed the page)?

Why is it that we have not been told that from the US Medicare database (not available to the public) that 48,000 people died within 14-days of receiving their jab (which is multiple times the number shown in the VAERS (voluntary adverse events reporting system data)?

(Of particular note is the fact that the Medicare database represents only 18.1 % of the US population, meaning that the real death numbers from the vax in this period only are more likely to conservatively be at least 200,000).

Extensive and shocking information can be found at my link below on Covid Vaccine Deaths. Be warned it is grim reading.


5. Why did Mr. John O’Looney, the owner of a family funeral business in Milton Keynes, UK, claim that whenever the vaccinations started to happen in bulk he saw a very significant rise in the number of deaths in the population, claiming that he was burying the dead at a rate he had never experienced previously and, after talking to many medical professionals and frontline workers, concluded that he was “dealing with murder victims”?

6. Why did the 45 undertakers in Mr. O’Looney’s regional area also say that they could scarcely keep up with the rate of burials, and why would Mr. O’Looney say those things believing that it would probably cost him his membership of the association – which it did soon after he went public?

Funeral Directer John O'Looney Blows the Whistle on Covid


7. Why, if the vax is safe have US Army doctors filed affidavits in a lawsuit for a preliminary injunction in Federal District Court of Colorado, under the Military Whistleblower Protection Act, calling for an immediate halt to further COVID-19 “vaccinations” for all military personnel and the grounding of all personnel as a result of three pulmonary embolism events within 48 hours of their vaccination, one fatal? 8. Why is it that the governments of the UK, Europe, and the USA maintain that “the vaccines are safe” yet 5-million adverse events (where approximately 50% will result in life-time disablement) have been recorded in the voluntary reporting systems – which have been acknowledged in numerous studies to under-report adverse events by a factor of between 10 to 100? And why was the vaccination program not stopped in Australia given that the number of adverse events recorded in 2020 were 2 x number of adverse events recorded for the previous 20-years combined?

Bow the OpenVaers data from October 15th 2021


5. What are the Real Experts Saying?

Why did Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi who is a leading virus expert in microbiology in Germany, one of the most cited research scientists in German history, former professor at the Johannes Gutenberg University in Mainz and head of the Institute for Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, say:

Gene-based vaccines are an absolute danger to mankind and their use at present violates the Nuremberg codex, such that everyone who is propagating their use should be put before tribunal.”Especially the vaccination of children is something that is so criminal that I have no words to express my horror … We are horribly worried that there’s going to be an impact on fertility. And this will be seen in years or decades from now. And this is potentially one of the greatest crimes, simply one of the greatest crimes imaginable.”?


Dr. Bhakdi Explains COVID Vaccine Effects: Interview with Dr. Mercola


COVID Vaccine Necessity, Efficacy and Safety


2. Why does Dr. Peter McCullough, MD, MPH, FACC, FACP, FAHA, FASN, FNKF, FNLA, FCSRA, Prof. of Medicine with more than 1000 publications with more than 600 citations in the National Library of medicine, a world-renowned expert and leader in cardio and renal medicine, who has cured many hundreds of Covid patients with more than a 99 % success rate state: “The current code vaccines; AstraZeneca, J&J, Pfizer & Moderna right now are obsolete. They do not cover the new variance. Patients are failing on these vaccines, they're being hospitalised and getting sick despite having the vaccines. The vaccines at this point in time have amounted to record mortality and percent injury, and should be considered unsafe and unfit for human use.”The failed mass Covid-19 vaccination programme will go down as one of the most deadly in history.”?

Below Dr. Peter McCullough - 5 Most Important Covid Facts

MUST VIEW Video: Dr. Peter McCullough Reveals Raw Covid Truth & Vaccine Facts




3. Why does Nobel Laureate Dr. Luc Montagnier, expert virologist, awarded the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine in 2008 with a colleague for his discovery of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) say: “We’re in unknown territory and proclaim mandatory vaccines for everyone. It’s insanity. It’s vaccination insanity that I absolutely condemn.”? And why is Dr. Montagnier claiming that widespread vaccination of children could have horrific generational consequences. And that the “Messenger RNA” may result in disastrous consequences without proper study; and why does he warn of the possibility of side effects of vaccines that could be seen in five to ten years related to neurodegenerative illness?

Nobel Prize winner Dr. Luc Montagnier, Reveals – Covid Vaccine is ‘Creating Variants’


4. Why does Dr. Zev Zelenko, a Nobel prize nominee and Presidential medal of freedom nominee who has successfully treated hundreds of Covid patients with a 100% survival rate, where his patients rarely require hospitalisation say: “Covid War Criminals Should Face Nuremberg-Style Trials For Crimes Against Humanity.”?

5. Why does Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche, virologist and vaccine expert, who sits at the top of his field in what are probably the deepest and most insightful (non-Big Pharma funded) scientific articles that you will ever read on Covid make the following claims: “The mass vaccination hype will undoubtedly enter history as the most reckless experiment in the history of medicine."Major outbreaks in countries with full vaccination rates … show that Herd Immunity is not improbable but impossible."Mass vaccination campaigns may have a beneficial short-time effect in that they reduce viral spread and protect vulnerable people from disease (e.g., elderly people and those with underlying disease), but will eventually drive the propagation of more infectious variants.”?

6. Why is the MSM not telling us that Dr. Reiner Fuellmich (who was a lead lawyer in suing Volkswagen over Diesel-gate for $ 4.3 billion – the largest automotive fine in history) has assembled an associated team of more than 10,000 doctors and more than 100 lawyers to bring a Nuremberg 2.0 type trial in relation to the vaccine-pushers; he states:

The frauds committed by Volkswagen and Deutsche Bank pale in comparison to the damage wrought by those who sold the Covid-19 crisis as the worst viral outbreak to hit the world in more than a century and used it to cause media-driven panic, government overreach and human suffering on a scale still not fully quantified.”?


Dr. Fuellmich: There is No Corona Pandemic, It's a Fraudulent 'PCR Test Pandemic'


6. Vaxxed versus Unvaxxed

Why is it that, in the latest data from the UK, US and Australia, we are now seeing death rates for vaxxed people which are GREATER THAN that for unvaxxed people (whereas in the early days of vaccination it was the other way round), as has been predicted by several top non-government virologists and immunologists?

Why is the case that the latest data that has been exposed from the DOD-stamped document in the US, that would have been presented to the CDC and other agencies, shows that 71% of all new Covid infections are breakthrough infections, i.e. from people who have been vaxxed – meaning that it is a crisis of the vaxxed not the unvaxxed; and these numbers are rising?

Why is it that NO government sources are telling us what a growing number of experts have been saying all along – which is that vaxxed people can pass illness from the spike protein onto the unvaxxed, according to PFIZER’S OWN DOCUMENTS?

Why is it that we have heard nothing in the MSM or from our politicians that an exceptionally extensive study involving both 2,947 US counties and 68 countries show that there is not only no difference in the Covid infection rates between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated, but that the rate of Covid amongst the vaccinated INCREASES with the percentage of the population who are vaccinated?

Why, if the vaccinations are effective against Covid, is it that the hospitalisation stats from Victoria in late September 2021 were officially announced to be as follows:

375 people in hospital with Covid. 78% double vaxxed, 17% single vaxxed, 5% unvaxxed? 6. Why, if the vaccinations are effective against Covid, are the percentages of people dying from Covid who have received vaccinations in NSW increasing to a rate where they are comparable to that of unvaccinated people?

20 Scientific studies prove that COVID-19 vaccine mandates are useless to health, harmful to society


Lethal Injection; Frontline E.R. Doctor Gives Chilling Account of Unusual Vaccine-Induced Illness


Trends in Mortality and Morbidity in the Most Vaccinated Countries: Twenty-one Proven Facts


Dangerous and Useless Vaccines Continue to Kill


None of the vaccine trials currently under way are designed to detect a reduction in any serious outcome such as hospital admissions, use of intensive care, or deaths. Nor are the vaccines being studied to determine whether they can interrupt transmission of the virus.


Pfizer “vaccine”: kill 200 to ‘save’ one? Analysis of official data shows the risks attached to Covid “vaccine” far outweighs any theoretical reward.


Data Analyst proves Covid-19 Deaths increased dramatically AFTER the Vaccine roll-out in over 40 countries


Canadian ER Doctor Quits: At Least 80% of Patients Are Double Vaxxed.


Covid vaccine effectiveness goes into the negative, meaning jabbed people are seeing HIGHER rates of disease


Covid vaccines make you more ill. Vaccinated people accounted for 82% of Covid-19 deaths, 69% of hospitalisations & 54% of cases in September according to official figures


Number of deaths in Taiwan after jabs exceeding covid deaths.


Investigative Journalist Exposes Pentagon-funded Study that Can Prove COVID-19 Vaccines Do More Harm than Good and Create the Variants


Study data reveals that by August in the USA, 71% of all COVID-19 cases were in vaccinated individuals


Israel is reporting the highest coronavirus infection rate in the world despite the majority of the people being vaccinated.


Most vaccinated state in America now seeing massive surge in covid hospitalizations


In the UK 80% of Covid-19 Deaths in August Were Vaccinated People


STUDY: Covid vaccines are NOT reducing infection rates


Former CDC Director Robert Redfield said that more than 40% of people who have recently died from Covid in Maryland were fully vaccinated.


Taiwan Government Says More People Die From COVID-19 Vaccine than From Wuhan Virus


Covid outbreak among 100 Royal Navy crew after night out in Cyprus despite whole crew having two vaccines.


Ireland: Two Counties With 99.7% and 98%+ ‘Fully Vaccinated’ See Massive Covid ‘Outbreaks’


7. Children

Why are countries rolling out the vaccine to children aged 12 – 16, when the reported deaths of children from the flu in the US is greater than that of Covid?

(As of now, there are 332 deaths of children with COVID in the U.S. This compares to about 450/year in a normal flu season—and remember, these 332 deaths occurred during TWO COVID seasons. Beyond this, the CDC has noted that 35% of these deaths could not possibly have had anything to do with COVID [e.g., they were car accidents, suicides, etc.]. Thus, the actual number is not possibly above 219). 2. Why are we rolling out the vax to those under 18 years of age when up until 5th Sept 2021 there has been only one (1) death in the 10-19 age group in Australia (and the one Covid positive death was someone who had passed away from viral meningitis)? 3. Why are doctors not informing children and parents that the risk of children dying from the vaccine is 4 x that compared to Covid, according to a consortium of Irish doctors appearing in a video by the Irish Council of Human Rights?

Teen deaths up to 125% higher than the 5-year-average since they started to be given the Covid-19 Vaccine according to official ONS data


13 reasons why you should not allow your child to get the Covid-19 Vaccine


Autopsy proves Covid-19 Vaccine killed healthy 22-year-old who developed Myocarditis; & Study proves the jab is mainly causing the condition in Teens


4. Why are doctors not informing parents and children that the risk of vaccination in 12 – 15 year-old males increases their odds of developing a serious myocarditis condition post-jab (which is frequently permanent) by a factor of 19. 5. Why are governments constantly pressuring children and institutions, even when official advisory bodies to the government are recommending against it, to take the vaccine when there are numerous studies (almost all suppressed) showing that there is a NEGATIVE BENEFIT for children to take the vaccine, noting especially an exponential rise in debilitating myocarditis events experienced by young males in particular? 6. Why, if vaccines are safe for children, did Project Veritas recently release a bombshell undercover video where Brandon Schadt, Johnson & Johnson’s Regional Business Lead was caught admitting the following re giving the vax to children: “It’s a kid, you just don’t do that, you know? Not something that’s so unknown in terms of repercussions down the road, you know?” “Kids shouldn’t get a f*cking [COVID] vaccine.” “It’s a kid, it’s a f*cking kid, you know? They shouldn’t have to get a f*cking [COVID] vaccine”

Project Veritas EXPOSES COVID Vaccine Part 3: "Kids Shouldn’t Get A F****** [COVID] Vaccine"

https://rumble.com/vn1ks9-project-veritas-exposes-covid-vaccine-part-3-kids-shouldnt-get-a-f-covid-va.html 7. Why are NZDSOS (New Zealand Doctors Speaking Out with Science) being ignored by the NZ government, when they have reported 5 deaths in vaxxed teenagers, and why are the NZ authorities not reporting these deaths? And why have gag orders been placed on people associated with all of these deaths, and why are the NZ government effectively covering up these facts?

8. Conflicts of interest? To better understand how the MSM and special interest groups manipulate medical narratives I would highly recommend having a listen to the very insightful TEDx talk video by Sharyl Attkisson called, “Astroturf and manipulation of media messages.”

Why might there be some concern regarding Prof. Peter Doherty (notwithstanding his positive contributions to the industry) and the Peter Doherty Institute due to the fact that he is in collaboration with Vaccine and Immunisation Research Group/Murdoch Children's Research Institute which has received very significant amounts of funding from vaccine manufacturers GSK, Janssen, Merck, Novavax, Sanofi and Sequiris?

2. Why would we trust Bill Gates, who is renowned for his absolutely appalling safety record regarding vaccine rollout – particularly in India – where the Indian government is suing him for the paralysis of 496,000 children as a result of Gates’s vaccines? 3. Why would we trust Bill Gates and his ties with the pharmaceutical industry when for Gates it has been, and always will be, about making unfathomable amounts of money, like the way in which he stated on air that he would make $ 200-billion from his $ 10-billion investment in vaccines? 4. Why would we place such emphasis on the advice from Bill Gates – who continues to fund billions into vaccine research, development and promotion – directly or indirectly funding the many institutions that make the policy decisions regarding vaccine rollouts? 5. Why might we believe that any research papers by ‘respected’ medical institutions or publishers that are partly or entirely funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates’ foundation, GAVI and so on would be likely to give positive reviews for products such as Hydroxychloroquine and the like, that compete with vaccines that Gates’ is developing? 6. Why do we permit such blatant and widespread conflicts of interest between the vaccine manufacturers, Bill Gates’s foundations, research institutions and many of our UK, Australian and US government leaders, which in a traditional corporate setting would be unthinkable, and which would lead to significant fines and prosecutions? 7. Why is it that Professor Neil Ferguson, epidemiologist with the Imperial College London, who collaborates with WHO and receives funding from the Gates Foundation, has such an influential position in advising the UK government on the effects of national or global disease outbreaks – when almost every single one of his predictions from Swine Flu to Ebola have been over-exaggerated by multiple orders of magnitude? 8. Why is it that many of the technocrats in many countries who are advising the governments and policy makers have direct or indirect financial interests in Big Pharma – where in the US for instance there is an interconnected web between Big Pharma funding, Bill Gates, the NIH, CDC, FDA etc? 9. And why do the authorities not seem to have an issue with the fact that Bill Gates – who is inextricably linked with Big Pharma, is THE BIGGEST donor to the WHO after the US government?

For more extensive research on Bill Gates see below:


Why does the mainstream media NEVER report any negative effects of any vaccines even when more people have died from the Covid vaccines in 2021 than from all other vaccines combined over 30 years.

See below how the mainstream media are connected to 'Big Pharma'.

Listen below as Bill Gates says in April 2020 that we cannot open up society until we have an immunity pass or vaccine passport. How does he know that in April 2020. Does he know what the pre-planned script is?

9. Big Pharma – Data, Testing and Trust

Why should we trust vaccine manufacturers, who have one goal which is to make money ($ tens of billions every year from the booster shots alone) and who have for the past several decades had complete and absolute prosecutorial immunity against being sued?

2. Why would we trust Big Pharma, given the plethora of past and current lawsuits against them – including a record-breaking $ 2.3-billion fine for fraud against Pfizer in 2009 – the largest in Pharma history? … only to be outdone by GlaxoSmithKline three years later with a $ 3-billion fine for fraud allegations and failure to report safety data?


3. Why are vaccinated people not told that vaccine trials indicate that there is a chance that the vaccine can penetrate the endothelial layer and the blood brain barrier causing neurological damage, and why is there A LACK OF INFORMED CONSENT provided before being vaxxed? 4. Why is it that the four major vaccine companies have denied that graphene oxide is used in their vaccines, yet a very comprehensive study conducted in Sept 2021 unambiguously and categorically showed that all four of the major vaccines DO contain graphene oxide?

https://www.thehardtruth.co.uk/post/pfizer-contents 5. Why is it that there is no MSM publicity surrounding the findings from the mid-Sept 2021 Corona Committee Conference from 35 groups from across the US, the UK, Austria and Japan that looked at hundreds of samples from three of the vaccine manufacturers, finding sharp metal objects, graphene fragments, and non-biological (inorganic) material - that “have no business being in a vaccine” according to the researchers?

Below Dr. Carrie Madej joined "The Stew Peters Show" with images of the contents of a Pfizer Vaccine vial

Dr. Carrie Madej joined "The Stew Peters Show" with images that should shock the entire world, and should immediately be investigated by lawmakers.


6. Why does there seem to be a media blackout on the fact that a group of lawyers, medical professionals and activists have asked members of the Polish parliament and Senate to organise an urgent investigation into the allegations of numerous whistle-blowers who have claimed that Pfizer was performing testing on 6-month-old orphan babies as part of their experiments?

7. Why is there not an outcry over the fact that 2,300 private emails from Dr. Anthony Fauci and various agencies and Big Tech reps (including Mark Zuckerberg) reveal that: Hydroxychloroquine is effective against Covid Masks are useless against Covid Fauci was talking to Big Tech about censorship of cures for Covid Fauci makes a small fortune from the funding, vaccine research and patent ownership from the vaccines. Covid was man-made in a lab Fauci’s ‘gain of function’ research funded it, a practice that is illegal in the US because of the significant risks that it poses.

Why are we not being told that taking Covid mRNA vaccines, according to an increasing number of studies (despite the wave of denial to the contrary by Big Pharma) is resulting in an accelerated rate of Antibody Dependent Enhancement (ADE), INCREASING the likelihood of developing illness from new Covid strains where those vaxxed are showing an increased risk of vaccine failure / covid infections requiring hospitalization?

How did Dr Fauci (who is director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and the Chief Medical Advisor to the President) know in 2017 (just after Donald Trump was made President) that a surprise outbreak of an infectious disease and a pandemic would happen in Trump's term of office? Unless it was planned?

A “training exercise” predicted the pandemic just weeks before it started. In October 2019 the World Economic Forum and Johns Hopkins University held Event 201. This was a training exercise based on a zoonotic coronavirus starting a worldwide pandemic. The exercise was sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and GAVI the vaccine alliance.

The exercise published its findings and recommendations in November 2019 as a “call to action”. One month later, China recorded their first case of “Covid”.



8. Why were there ZERO studies conducted on the vaccines to show the effect that they would have regarding:-




Auto immune diseases

Other drugs being taken?

9. Why do documents from Moderna show that in just three months after roll-out, their internal reporting systems part way through the pandemic had recorded a staggering 300,000 adverse reactions to the jab, multiple times the figures contained within the VAERS database? 10. Why did the FDA not address the manipulations and violations from Pfizer regarding the protocol surrounding the testing of children after it submitted its review prior to approval, according to Dr. Yaffa Shir-Raz, a risk-communication researcher and a teaching fellow in the University of Haifa, Israel? (She reported that the conventional Phase 3 part of the trial that normally lasts between 1 to 4-years was completed in only 30-days; and at least four of the children in the study [a significantly high number at 0.4%] suffered from serious adverse events – that is, events in which at least one criterion was met: caused death, is life-threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent disability/incapacity, a congenital anomaly/birth defect?)

10. Ivermectin - the herd of elephants in the room

Why is there widespread negative publicity by the authorities stating that Ivermectin is ineffective, unsafe, unproven, without peer reviewed studies in the fight against Covid, when in fact:

There have been at least 42 peer reviewed studies on Ivermectin

It is as safe or safer than paracetamol

It has won a Nobel Prize

It has seen 3.7-billion doses administered worldwide

It has been used very extensively and successfully in the fight against Covid - in India, El Salvador, and around 30 other countries?

It has been shown to reduce mortality anywhere between 65 % to 85% in the majority of studies, depending principally on how soon it is administered to Covid patients?

2. Why have we not been told that the countries in Africa that have been using Ivermectin have 7 x less morbidity and 8 x less mortality from Covid compared to nations that do not? 3. Why, if vaccines are effective, is it the case that the countries that are highly vaccinated like Israel (who experienced a surge in cases upon the rollout of the third [booster] shot) have multiple times the cases of Covid compared to Uttar Pradesh’s province of 241-million inhabitants that used Ivermectin along with some other inexpensive drugs in a widespread program that resulted in complete eradication of Covid in most of its regions? 4. Why have we constantly been told that Ivermectin is ineffective against Covid (where ‘evidence’ that cites poorly conducted, non-peer reviewed studies is used) when the amount of evidence – peer reviewed and otherwise to the contrary is simply overwhelmingly without equal? (For evidence regarding why Ivermectin works there is a paper by a retired Australian doctor called Dr. Robyn Stephenson called “It is Dangerous to Suggest that Early Treatment for Covid-19 is Unsafe”published by The Canberra Declaration who spent 6-months performing research into Covid, citing 119 sources, on all things Covid. In my opinion this is literally in the top 0.1% of best research papers that I have come across on any topic). 5. Why, if Ivermectin is as effective in the fight against Covid as the abundant amount of (non-Big-Pharma linked) research suggests, have the TGA banned it? And why does the TGA both investigate, deregister and fine doctors with a risk of imprisonment if they prescribe Ivermectin to patients within Australia? 6. Why did the head of Merck, Sharpe & Dorne – the inventor of Ivermectin, advise against Ivermectin’s use in the treatment of Covid via this very inexpensive off-patent drug, (just before landing a $ 1.2-billion government contract for the supply of an expensive drug used to fight Covid)? 7. Why was it that as soon as Ivermectin was being touted as a cure for Covid, more than 200 scientific studies appeared [many with Big Pharma linked funding] warning us of its dangers and lambasting those who were being hospitalised for taking the horse-worming versions [despite having no evidence from either hospitals or people that this was happening])? 8. Why was it not publicised by the MSM that the Indian Bar Association is suing Dr. Soumya Swaminathan, chief scientist of the WHO, for supposedly deliberately ignoring and suppressing the FLCCC and the BIRD Panel’s data regarding the effectiveness of the drug Ivermectin, with an intent to dissuade the people of India from using Ivermectin? 9. Why is it, if Ivermectin is unsafe and ineffective against Covid, is it being given to select (vaxxed) Covid patients in some Australian hospitals? 10. Why is it that the Australian government has banned Ivermectin when the evidence relating to its safe and effective use against Covid is breathtaking, covering the following types of studies and trials – which almost all show moderate to significant efficacy in the fight against Covid

Randomized Clinical Studies

Observational Clinical Studies

Epidemiologic Studies

In-vitro studies

In vivo studies

In-silico studies

Clinical, Pharmacologic observations / experience

Observational control trials

Meta analysis of randomised control trials

Observational and randomised trials?

11. Why do the Western nations of the world in particular take no notice of the fact that Uttar Pradesh in India has practically eradicated Covid whilst by comparison the Indian state of Kadesh who are not using Ivermectin has a Covid case rate of more than 1000 x that of Uttar Pradesh?

The unmistakable ivermectin miracle in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh


Trust the Science: The Evidence for Ivermectin and COVID-19


There are currently at least 83 studies, with 43 being peer-reviewed (as of April 3, 2021), showing that Ivermectin is highly effective in treating COVID-19 in early stages and as prophylaxis (preventative measure).

A link to the studies: https://c19ivermectin.com

Slovakia Becomes the First EU Nation to Formally Approve Ivermectin for Both Prophylaxis and Treatment for COVID-19 Patients


Antiparasitic drug Ivermectin kills coronavirus in 48 hours



Here’s the reason why Covid pandemic hoax perps aggressively undermined every possible treatment for COVID-19 no matter how effective it proved to be.

Emergency Use Authorization for Vaccines Explained

What is an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA)?

U.S. Food & Drug Administration

“An Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) is a mechanism to facilitate the availability and use of medical countermeasures, including vaccines, during public health emergencies, such as the current COVID-19 pandemic. Under an EUA, FDA may allow the use of unapproved medical products, or unapproved uses of approved medical products in an emergency to diagnose, treat, or prevent serious or life-threatening diseases or conditions when certain statutory criteria have been met, including that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives”.

The key language in the preceding excerpt is this: “that there are no adequate, approved, and available alternatives”.

In other words, had there been effective remedies or treatments for COVID-19 (which there was), the FDA could not have invoked the “Emergency Use Authorization for Vaccines”. Therefore, the extremely dangerous and deadly rollout of the untested and unsafe Covid injections / shots (they’re not vaccines) was allowed to proceed post-haste across the nation. But, to the great detriment of the American people who took them without the required informed consent prior to their Covid vaccinations.

This was the same scenario in the UK where the Covid vaccines where only allowed because of emergency use and the belief that there was NO effective treatment, which is a lie.

That is why the governments banned the use of Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and the media censored information about its effectiveness so that people where not informed of these covid treatments so that they would then accept the vaccine.

This ongoing state of affairs constitutes nothing less than a crime against humanity. And, when the vaccinated start dropping like flies, it will be rightly called a planned genocide.


“I am telling you that all the governments, their scientific advisors, Big Pharma and regulatory agencies will tell you that Ivermectin does not work on Covid-19. They are lying. I am inviting any of them to sue me, but they won't, for I would win easily. If Ivermectin was more widely used, there would be no need for covid vaccines”.Dr. Mike Yeadon

Below Dr Simone Gold - January 3rd 2020 from America's Frontline Doctors describes the lies around the official Covid-19 narrative including hydroxychloroquine and the covid vaccines.


'The current shaming, blaming and censorship of doctors who oppose government policy - which is to reject alternatives to a vaccine route - is extremely concerning.' - Dr. Dick Bijl + 2,500 Medical Professionals


11. Government Policy and politics

Why is it that members of a growing number of countries, including Poland (a previously Communist country) are protesting against the claimed overreaches of the Police in Victoria against protestors (notwithstanding the fact that some protesters were doing the wrong thing), outside the Australian Embassy in Warsaw, Poland, prompting the following statements:

The whole world sees what is happening in Australia. Australia has contracted Covid madness.This is how totalitarianism is born, these are not conspiracy theories.”? 2. Why does there seem to be almost no concern nor criticism by the MSM and politicians in Australia regarding the draconian treatment of protesters in Victoria in particular who were shot in the back with rubber bullets while running away from Police, whilst others have been slammed head-first into the ground, encouraged by commanders who look forward to “cracking some skulls?” 3. Why is it that the governments of many countries, Australia in particular, are mandating severe, draconian lockdowns – that have been condemned for quite some time now by the WHO for leading to significant deprivations to both people’s and nation’s health and wellbeing? 4. Why is Australia focused on going down the lockdown route whenever there are numerous studies showing that lockdowns don’t work, including significant examples like Sweden which was infamous within Europe for having almost no lockdown, instead keeping schools, businesses and their economy open? 5. Why do the politicians in Australia and in NZ (who locked down the whole of the South Island despite having ZERO Covid cases, decimating the tourism industry in the process) choose to lock down their regions, despite the evidence from states like North Dakota and South Dakota that experienced near identical Covid statistics despite one state opening up and one state remaining locked down?

We can clearly see on this graph that the 7 countries with the highest death rates on the right all locked down hard and the 7 countries that did not lockdown on the left in green had fewer deaths. Which proves lockdowns don't work, unless the aim is to create fear and poverty.