Why you should not give the Covid Vaccines to Children

Dr Robert Malone - Before You Inject Your Child


My name is Robert Malone, and I am speaking to you as a parent, grandparent, physician and scientist. I don’t usually read from a prepared speech, but this is so important that I wanted to make sure that I get every single word and scientific fact correct.

I stand by this statement with a career dedicated to vaccine research and development. I’m vaccinated for COVID and I'm generally pro-vaccination. I have devoted my entire career to developing safe and effective ways to prevent and treat infectious diseases.

Regarding the genetic COVID vaccines, the science is settled.

They are not working, and they are not completely safe.

Now we have Omicron. These vaccines were designed for the Original Wuhan strain, a different virus. Whether they made sense for protecting our elderly and frail from the original virus is irrelevant.  So let’s stop arguing about that. We must look forward.

These vaccines do not prevent Omicron infection, viral replication, or spread to others.  In our daily lives, with our friends, with our families, we all know that this is true.

These genetic vaccines are leaky, have poor durability, and even if every man, woman, and child in the United States were vaccinated, these products cannot achieve herd immunity and stop COVID. They are not completely safe, and the full nature of the risks remain unknown.  In contrast, the natural immunity which healthy immune systems develop after infection and recovery from COVID is long lasting, broad, and highly protective from disease and death caused by this virus.

If there is risk, there must be choice.

Before you inject your child - a decision that is irreversible - I wanted to let you know the scientific facts about this genetic vaccine, which is based on the mRNA vaccine technology I created:

There are three issues parents need to understand:

  • The first is that a viral gene will be injected into your children's cells. This gene forces your child’s body to make toxic spike proteins. These proteins often cause permanent damage in children’s critical organs, including

  • Their brain and nervous system

  • Their heart and blood vessels, including blood clots

  • Their reproductive system

  • And this vaccine can trigger fundamental changes to their immune system

  • The most alarming point about this is that once these damages have occurred, they are irreparable

  • You can’t fix the lesions within their brain

  • You can’t repair heart tissue scarring

  • You can’t repair a genetically reset immune system, and

  • This vaccine can cause reproductive damage that could affect future generations of your family

  • The second thing you need to know about is the fact that this novel technology has not been adequately tested.

  • We need at least 5 years of testing/research before we can really understand the risks

  • Harms and risks from new medicines often become revealed many years later

  • Ask yourself if you want your own child to be part of the most radical medical experiment in human history

  • One final point: the reason they’re giving you to vaccinate your child is a lie.

  • Your children represent no danger to their parents or grandparents

  • It’s actually the opposite. Their immunity, after getting COVID, is critical to save your family if not the world from this disease


As a parent, it is ultimately your responsibility to protect your children. If they are harmed by these genetic vaccines, you are the one that will have to take care of them.  And you will carry that burden for the rest of your life and theirs. On average, between one in two thousand and one in three thousand children that receive these vaccines will be hospitalized in the short term with vaccine-caused damage.  Only with the passage of time will we know what long term damage may occur.  The vaccines do not protect our children from becoming infected with Omicron, and do not prevent infected children from infecting others.  In contrast, the pharmaceutical companies and the government are almost fully protected from any damages these products might cause to them.  If your child is damaged by these vaccines, you will be left alone with both your grief and the burden of care.

These genetic vaccines can damage your children.  They may damage their brain, their heart, their immune system, and their ability to have children in the future.  And many of these types of damages cannot be repaired.

So I beg you, please, get informed about the possible risks that your children may be damaged by these experimental medical products.  Don’t let anyone tell you what to do.  Think for yourself.  Because it is your responsibility to protect and nurture them.  If they are damaged, no state Governor, no federal public health official, no television doctor will be there to help you.  You, your family and your child will have to carry the load yourselves.

In summary: there is no benefit for your children or your family to be vaccinating your children against the small risks of the virus, given the known health risks of the vaccine that as a parent, you and your children may have to live with for the rest of their lives.

The risk/benefit analysis isn’t even close.

As a parent and grandparent, my recommendation to you is to resist and fight to protect your children.





13 reasons why

Children should not be given the Covid-19 Vaccine

On Tuesday December 22nd the UK Medicine Regulator (MHRA) gave emergency use authorisation for the Pfizer / BioNTech Covid-19 injection to be administered to all children between the ages of 5 and 11.

Then within minutes, the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) advised the UK Government to roll the jab out to all children deemed to be in a clinical risk group, or who are a household contact of someone who is immunosuppressed.

Professor Wei Shen Lim, Chair of the JCVI said:

“The majority of children aged 5 to 11 are at very low risk of serious illness due to COVID-19. However, some 5 to 11 year olds have underlying health conditions that put them at higher risk, and we advise these children to be vaccinated in the first instance.”

With the alleged Omicron variant about to become the dominant strain in the UK it makes very little sense to give the Pfizer injection to children due to the fact that it only targets the S protein of the virus, which is heavily mutated in Omicron.

But that is not the only reason why children as young as 5 should not be given the Covid-19 injection.

For a parent to be competent enough to make the decision to consent to their child having the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine, they should be made aware of all the facts before they reach their decision. So here is 13 factual reasons why 5 to 11-year-old children should not be given the Covid-19 vaccine, in fact any children under 18.

Reason No. 1
86% of 12-15-year old Children suffered an Adverse Reaction to the Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine in the Clinical Trial


The information is publicly available and contained within a US Food & Drug Administration (FDA) fact sheet which can be viewed here (see page 25, table 5 on-wards).

That fact sheet contains two tables that detail the alarming rate of side effects and damage experienced by 12 – 15- year-old children who were given at least one dose of the Pfizer mRNA injection.

The tables shows that 1,127 children were given one dose of the mRNA jab, but only 1,097 children received the second dose. This fact in itself raises questions as to why 30 children did not receive a second dose of the Pfizer jab.

Of the 1,127 children who received a first dose of the jab 86% experienced an adverse reaction. Of the 1,097 children who received a second dose of the jab 78.9% experienced an adverse reaction.

Reason No. 2
1 in 9 Children suffered a Severe Adverse Reaction leaving them unable to perform daily activities in the Pfizer Clinical Trial


For children 12 to 15 years of age, the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine clinical trial found the overall incidence of severe adverse events which left them unable to perform daily activities, during the two-month observation period to be 10.7%, or 1 in 9, in the vaccinated group and 1.9% in the unvaccinated group.

Consequently, children who received the vaccine had nearly six times the risk of a severe adverse event occurring in the two-month observation period compared to children who did not receive the vaccine. In addition, the incidence of Covid-19 in the unvaccinated group was 1.6%, therefore, there were almost seven times more severe adverse events observed in the vaccinated group than there were Covid-19 cases in the unvaccinated group.

This information is all freely available to see in official Food and Drug Administration (FDA) documents and official Centre for Disease Control (CDC) documents.

Reason No. 3
Just 17 deaths associated with Covid-19 have occurred in Teenagers & Children since March 2020


Official NHS data which can be viewed here (see Table 3 – COVID-19 deaths by age group and pre-existing condition of the downloadable excel document) shows that since March 2020 just 17 people under the age of 19 have died with Covid-19 who had no known pre-existing conditions in England’s hospitals, up to the 8th December 2021. The data also shows that just 60 people under the age of 19 have died with Covid-19 in the same time frame who did have other serious underlying conditions.

There are approximately 15.6 million people aged 19 and under in the United Kingdom which means just 1 in every 260,000 children and teenagers have allegedly died with Covid-19 in 21 months who had other serious pre-existing conditions. Whilst just 1 in every 917,647 children have allegedly died with Covid-19 in 21 months, who had no know pre-existing conditions.

A scientific study titled ‘Deaths in Children and Young People in England following SARS-CoV-2 infection during the first pandemic year: a national study using linked mandatory child death reporting data’ (which can be found here), conducted by Clare Smith of NHS England and Improvement and several Universities also concluded that children are at negligible risk of death, hospitalisation, or serious illness due to the alleged Covid-19 virus.

The study collated data from the National Child Mortality Database; a mandatory system that records all deaths in Children under 18 years of age in England. What the researchers found is that just 25 children under the age of 18 died of Covid-19 between March 2020 and February 2021, with 15 of the 25 having a pre-existing life-limiting condition, and 19 of the 25 having a chronic condition.

The study also found that 16 of the 25 children who sadly died had two or more comorbidities with 8 children suffering pre-existing neurological and respiratory problems, 3 children suffering pre-existing neurological and cardiology problems, and 3 children suffering respiratory and cardiology problems.

Reason No. 4
The risk of Children developing serious illness due to Covid-19 is extremely low

A study (found here) led by Professor Russell Viner of UCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, published on the medRxiv server, found that 251 young people aged under 18 in England were admitted to intensive care with Covid-19 during the first year of the pandemic (until the end of February 2021).  

The results of the study found that there were 5,830 admissions associated with Covid-19 among children up to 17 years of age during the pandemic year, this represents just 1.3% of secondary care admissions among children.

The lead author of the study said: “These new studies show that the risks of severe illness or death from SARS-CoV-2 are extremely low in children and young people”.

Reason No. 5
The Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine is experimental and still in Clinical Trials


The Pfizer mRNA Covid-19 injection is in fact only temporarily authorised (see official MHRA document here) for emergency use only. In October the government made changes to the Human Medicines Regulations 2012 to allow the MHRA to grant temporary authorisation of a Covid-19 vaccine without needing to wait for the EMA.

A temporary use authorisation is valid for one year only and requires the pharmaceutical companies to complete specific obligations, such as ongoing or new studies. Once comprehensive data on the product have been obtained, standard marketing authorisation can be granted. This means that the manufacturer of the vaccine cannot be held liable for any injury or death that occurs due to their vaccine, unless it was due to a quality control issue.

The reason the Pfizer mRNA Covid-19 injection has only been granted temporary authorisation is because it is still in clinical trials that are not set to conclude until May 2nd 2023. You can see the official Clinical Trial Study Tracker for the Pfizer jab on the US National Library of Medicine site here.

This is the first time mRNA injections have ever been authorised for use in humans (see here), and the long term side effects are not known, meaning the millions of people around the world who have had the Pfizer Covid-19 injection are essentially taking part in an experiment.

Reason No. 6
Three Scientific Studies conducted by the UK Government, Oxford University, & CDC, which were published in August have found the Covid-19 Vaccines do not work


New research in multiple settings shows that the alleged Delta Covid-19 variant, the now dominant variant in the UK, produces very high viral loads which are just as high in the vaccinated population compared to the unvaccinated population. Therefore, vaccinating individuals does not stop or even slow the spread of the alleged dominant Delta Covid-19 variant.

CDC Study

The CDC study (found here) focused on 469 cases among Massachusetts residents who attended indoor and outdoor public gatherings over a two week period. The results found that 346 of the cases were among vaccinated residents with 74% of them presenting with alleged Covid-19 symptoms, and 1.2% being hospitalised. However, the remaining 123 cases were among the unvaccinated population with just 1 person being hospitalised (0.8%).

Oxford University Study

The Oxford University study (found here) examined 900 hospital staff members in Vietnam who had been vaccinated with the Oxford / AstraZeneca viral vector injection between March and April 2021. The entire hospital staff tested negative for the Covid-19 virus in mid May 2021 however, the first case among the vaccinated staff members was discovered on June 11th.

All 900 hospital staff were then retested for the Covid-19 virus and 52 additional cases were identified immediately, forcing the hospital into lockdown. Over the next two weeks, 16 additional cases were identified.

The study found that 76% of the Covid-19 positive staff developed respiratory symptoms, with 3 staff members developing pneumonia and one staff member requiring three days of oxygen therapy. Peak viral loads among the fully vaccinated infected group were found to be 251 times higher than peak viral loads found among the staff in March – April 2020 when they were not vaccinated.

UK Department of Health & Social Care Study

The UK Department of Health & Social Care study (found here) is an analysis of ongoing population wide SARS-CoV-2 monitoring in the UK and includes measures of viral load among the population.

The study found that viral loads among the vaccinated and unvaccinated population are virtually the same, and much higher than had been recorded prior to the Covid-19 injection roll-out. The study also found that the majority of cases among the vaccinated population were presenting with symptoms when they became positive.

The authors of the study conclude that the Pfizer and Oxford / AstraZeneca injection have lost efficacy against what they claim to be the Delta Covid-19 variant.

Reason No. 7
Public Health England Data shows the majority of Covid-19 Deaths are among the Vaccinated and suggests that the Vaccines worsen disease


Various UK Health Security Agency Vaccine Surveillance reports detail the number of Covid-19 cases by vaccination status in England. The following chart shows hospitalisations by vaccination status over a period of 16 weeks from 16 Aug 21 to 05 Dec 21.

Covid in vaxxed.JPG

The chart shows that between August and early September, the fully vaccinated population accounted for the majority of Covid-19 cases. However, between the middle of September and early October this switched to the not-vaccinated population accounting for the majority of cases. This is most likely due to children returning to school in September and being “encouraged” to test on a regular basis.

But between October 11th and December 5th the roles reversed again, and it is the fully vaccinated population that have accounted for the majority of Covid-19 cases in England.

This data alone puts an end to the myth that the Covid-19 vaccine will prevent children from being infected and spreading Covid-19.

The following chart shows hospitalisations by vaccination status over a period of 16 weeks from 16 Aug 21 to 05 Dec 21.

Covid in vaxxed2.JPG

Between Aug 16 and Dec 05, the unvaccinated population accounted for 11,767 Covid-19 hospitalisations. But the vaccinated population have accounted for nearly double the amount, recording 19,730 hospitalisations, with 18,406 of those being among the 2/3 dose vaccinated population. This means the vaccinated population have accounted for 63% of Covid-19 hospitalisations since August 2021.

The following chart shows deaths by vaccination status over a period of 16 weeks from 16 Aug 21 to 05 Dec 21.

Covid in vaxxed3.JPG

Between 16 Aug 21 and 05 Dec 21 there were 3,070 Covid-19 deaths among the unvaccinated population in England, compared to 12,058 deaths among the vaccinated population during the same time frame. That is a 293% difference.

The following chart shows the case-fatality rate among the not-vaccinated population, and the case-fatality rate among the 2/3 dose vaccinated population between 16 Aug and 05 Dec 21.

Case fatality.JPG

The case-fatality rate is calculated by dividing the number of known deaths by the number of known cases among the population. As we can see from the above the case-fatality rate among the not-vaccinated population is just 0.2%, which is what is in line with the average case-fatality rate in 2020 before a Covid-19 injection was introduced to the masses.

However, the case-fatality rate among the fully vaccinated population is much higher, equating to 0.8%. Therefore the fully vaccinated are 4 times / 300% more likely to die if exposed to the Covid-19 virus based on official UK Government figures.

The above data was extracted from the following official UK Health Security Agency Vaccine Surveillance reports –


Reason No. 8
There has been at least 1.4 million Adverse Reactions to the Covid-19 Vaccines in the UK alone up to January 6th 2022

The thirty-second report highlighting adverse reactions to the Pfizer / BioNTech, Oxford / AstraZeneca, and Moderna Covid-19 injections that have been reported to the UK Medicine Regulator’s (MHRA) Yellow Card scheme reveals that there were 1,414,293 adverse reactions reported between the 9th December 2020 up to the January 6th 2022.

The reports for each available vaccine can be found here under the analysis print section and include adverse reactions such as blindness, seizure, stroke, paralysis, cardiac arrest and many other serious ailments. As of December 8th 2021 there have now been over 1.3 million adverse reactions including 1,852 deaths.

The Pfizer mRNA injections had left at least 107 people fully paralysed and a number of other people partly paralysed up to the 1st September 2021. However, the MHRA state that an estimated 10% of adverse reactions are actually reported to the Yellow Card scheme, meaning the true figure of adverse reactions is immensely higher.


Reason No. 9
There were more deaths in 8 months due to the Covid-19 Vaccines than there have been due to all other available Vaccines combined since the year 2001


The UK Medicine Regulator responded to a Freedom of Information (found here) request demanding to know how many deaths have occurred in the past 20 years due to all vaccines, and their response revealed that there have been four times as many deaths in just eight months due to the Covid-19 injections.

The request was made via email to the Medicine and Healthcare product Regulatory Agency (MHRA) on the 6th August 2021, and in answer to the question asked on the number of deaths due to all other vaccines in the past twenty years, the MHRA revealed that they had received a total of 404 reported adverse reactions to all available vaccines (excluding the Covid-19 injections) associated with a fatal outcome between the 1st January 2001 and the 25th August 2021 – a time frame of 20 years and 8 months.

Reason No. 10
The risk of Myocarditis (Heart Inflammation) in Children due to the Pfizer Vaccine

Myocarditis is inflammation of the heart muscle, whilst Pericarditis is inflammation of the protective sacs surrounding the heart. Both are serious conditions due to the fact the heart muscle cannot regenerate, and both conditions have officially been added to the safety labels of the Pfizer jab and Moderna jab by the MHRA (see here).

Myocarditis and pericarditis happen very rarely in the general (unvaccinated) population, and it is estimated that in the UK there are about 6 new cases of myocarditis per 100,000 patients per year and about 10 new cases of pericarditis per 100,000 patients per year.

The MHRA has undertaken a thorough review of both UK and international reports of myocarditis and pericarditis following vaccination against Covid-19 due to a recent increase in reporting of these events in particular with the Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna vaccines, with a consistent pattern of cases occurring more frequently in young males.

Scientific Study published on the JAMA network, has also found that the incidence of myocarditis among vaccinated individuals is at least double what Health Authorities are claiming.

14 - Myocarditis risk.JPG

Myocarditis Tops List of COVID Vaccine Injuries Among 12- to 17-Year-Olds, VAERS Data Show


Dr Jessica Rose and Dr Peter McCullough wrote a paper on myocarditis rates caused by the vaccine, it basically says that myocarditis is caused by the vaccines and it isn’t rare



Myocarditis from COVID vs the Vaccine: Peter McCullough


Major Study: Heart Disease Risk in Young Males 14x Times Higher After Jab


Government VAERS Data Reveal 15,600% Increase in Heart Disease Among Under 30 Year-Olds Following COVID-19 Vaccination



Why Are Myocarditis Rates Surging in Europe?


Numbers don’t lie: British children 52 times more likely to die after COVID shot


Dr Vernon Coleman exposes the cover up of Myocarditis caused by the Covid-19 Vaccines


The new JAMA study (found here) showed a similar pattern to a CDC study (found here), although at higher incidence of myocarditis and pericarditis after vaccination, suggesting vaccine adverse event under-reporting.

The researchers calculated the average monthly number of cases of myocarditis or pericarditis during the pre-vaccine period of January 2019 through January 2021 was 16.9 compared with 27.3 during the vaccine period of February through May 2021.

The mean numbers of pericarditis cases during the same periods were 49.1 and 78.8.

Dr. George Diaz who conducted the study told Medscape that “Our study resulted in higher numbers of cases probably because we searched the EMR, and [also because] VAERS requires doctors to report suspected cases voluntarily,” Diaz told Medscape. Also, in the governments’ statistics, pericarditis and myocarditis were “lumped together”.

Reason No. 11
Children have died and are dying due to the Covid-19 Vaccines


The US Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS), which can be searched here by inputting the specific VAERS ID shows that several children have died in the US after having the Covid-19 vaccine, with many suffering cardiac arrest.

A 16 year-old female received the Pfizer vaccine on the 19th March 2021. Nine days later the same female went into cardiac arrest at home. By the 30th March 2021 she had sadly died. Found under VAERS ID 1225942.

child-vax death1.JPG

A 15 year-old female suffered cardiac arrest and ended up in intensive care four days after having the Moderna mRNA jab. She also sadly died. Found under VAERS ID 1187918.

child-vax death2.JPG

Another 15 year-old female received her second dose of the Pfizer jab on the 6th June 2021. Sadly one day later she died suddenly without reason. Found under VAERS ID 1383620.

child-vax death3.JPG

A 15 year-old male die due to an unexplained reason twenty-three days after having the Pfizer jab. Found under VAERS ID 1382906.

child-vax death4.JPG

The above are sadly just a few examples of the deaths to have occurred among children due to the Covid-19 vaccines in the USA.

Up to 65% Increase in Deaths Among 18-49 Year Olds in the U.S. During 2021, the Year of the Experimental COVID “Vaccines”



Deaths Among Male Teens Increased by 53% Following COVID-19 Vaccination in 2021 and the Death Spikes Correlate Perfectly with the Uptake of Dose 1, 2 & 3


Government VAERS Data Reveal 15,600% Increase in Heart Disease Among Under 30 Year-Olds Following COVID-19 Vaccination


Pfizer Covid-19 Vaccine increases Children’s risk of Death by 5100% according to the Office for National Statistics



Nearly 35,000 Reports of COVID Vaccine Injuries among 5- to 17-Year-Olds, CDC Data Show



Official Data shows Children are up to 52 times more likely to die following Covid-19 Vaccination than Unvaccinated Children & the ONS is trying to hide it


Pathologists who examined the autopsies of two teenage boys who died days after receiving Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine concluded the vaccine caused the teens’ deaths.



Just 6% of the batches of Covid-19 Vaccine produced have caused every single Adverse Reaction suffered by Children resulting in Permanent Disability or Death


Reason No. 12
Who profits from your Child getting the Covid-19 Vaccine?


It may surprise you to know that GP’s were already being incentivised to inject the adult population with the Covid-19 vaccine with a payment of £12.58 for every dose administered.

So it may surprise you further to know that GP’s are being offered an additional payment of £10 on top of the £12.58 already offered for every injection administered to a child in the United Kingdom. All of this is documented in an official NHS document found here.

According to the last count made in 2020 there are approximately 3,154,459 children between the ages of 12 and 15 in the United Kingdom. Therefore GP’s across the UK could stand to make a combined £142.45 million if every child is injected with a Covid-19 vaccine.

A Freedom of Information request (found here) which the MHRA responded to in May 2021 revealed that the current level of grant funding received from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation amounts to $3 million and covers “a number of projects”. The MHRA being the UK Medicine Regulator to have granted emergency use authorisation for the Pfizer / BioNTech mRNA vaccine to be given to children.

Coincidentally, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation bought shares in Pfizer back in 2002 (see here), and back in September 2020 Bill Gates ensured the value of his shares went up by announcing to the mainstream media in a CNBC interview that he viewed the Pfizer jab as the leader in the Covid-19 vaccine race.

“The only vaccine that, if everything went perfectly, might seek the emergency use license by the end of October, would be Pfizer.”

The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation also coincidentally bought $55 million worth of shares in BioNTech (see here) in September 2019, just before the alleged Covid-19 pandemic struck.

Can we really trust the MHRA to remain impartial when its primary funder is the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, who also own shares in Pfizer and BioNTech?

Reason No. 13
The Joint Committee on Vaccination & Immunisation refused to recommend the Pfizer Vaccine be offered to Children aged 12-15

On the 3rd September 2021 the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) announced (see here) they were not recommending the Pfizer Covid-19 injection be offered to all children over the age of 12.

The assessment by the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) is that the health benefits from vaccination are marginally greater than the potential known harms. However, the margin of benefit is considered too small to support universal vaccination of healthy 12 to 15 year olds at this time.

The JCVI cited the following –

“For the vast majority of children, SARS-CoV-2 infection is asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic and will resolve without treatment. Of the very few children aged 12 to 15 years who require hospitalisation, the majority have underlying health conditions.”

Since 1st April 2009 the Health Protection (Vaccination) Regulations 2009 place a duty on the Secretary of State for Health in England to ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, that the recommendations of JCVI are implemented (See here – page 6).

Yet in an unprecedented move, the Secretary for Health and the Government decided to bypass the JCVI and seek the advice of the four Chief Medical Officers (CMO’s) of the United Kingdom.

In their letter to the Government (found here), the UK CMO’s stated they looked at wider public health benefits and risks of universal vaccination in this age group to determine if this shifts the risk-benefit either way. They claimed in their letter that “the most important in this age group was impact on education”.

This raises some serious questions –

  1. Did Covid-19 close the schools? The answer is of course no. Schools were closed because of Government policy.

  2. Should a person take a medical treatment so that they are able to partake in society or education? The answer is of course no. A person should only ever take a medical treatment for a medical reason, in the case of the Covid-19 vaccine that reason should be to prevent infection; which it does not do, or prevent illness; which it will not do as children are at such low risk of suffering serious illness due to Covid-19.


The decision by Chris Whitty and his fellow Chief Medical Officers to advise the Government that the Covid-19 vaccines should be offered to children aged 12-15 was not a decision based on science, it was instead a decision based on politics.

So there you have it, 13 factual reasons why children should not be given the Covid-19 vaccine, and each and every one is based on the science.

Now the choice is yours, we hope you make the correct one.


In the video below listen to Dr Peter McCullough as he explains the dangers of Myocarditis in the young.

A link to the full video with Dr Peter McCullough and many other experts is below.


Below Canadian "Vaccine" Expert Dr. BYRAM BRIDLE: Talks about the Excessive Youth Heart Problems & Deaths Happening In the School Sports Leagues

Children do not need the covid vaccines as their chances of dying from Covid or being hospitalised by covid are practically zero.  So why then do they want to vaccinate children?  Robert Kennedy Jr gives us the reason.

As of January 2022 in the USA, EU and the UK, according to government's own vaccine adverse reporting system their has been over 6 million adverse reactions to the covid vaccines and over 63,000 deaths.  It is known that under 10% of adverse reactions get reported.  So the adverse reaction could be close to 60 million and the deaths at least 600,000 and that is not including the rest of the world.

See the following link for more data about the deaths and injuries from the Covid Vaccines



Govt Data: Covid-19 Vaccines Kill More Children than Covid-19 by Dr. Joseph Mercola


You can’t even compare the COVID shots to other vaccines. They’re by far the most dangerous injections ever created, yet there doesn’t appear to be a cutoff for acceptable harm. No one within the CDC or Food and Drug Administration, which jointly run VAERS, has addressed these shocking numbers. Both agencies outrageously deny that a single death can be attributed to the COVID jabs, which is simply impossible. It’s not statistically plausible. 

The FDA and CDC are also ignoring standard data analyses that can shed light on causation. It’s known as the Bradford Hill criteria — a set of 10 criteria that need to be satisfied in order to show strong evidence of causal relationship. One of the most important of these criteria is temporality, because one thing has to come before the other, and the shorter the duration between two events, the higher the likelihood of a causative effect.

Well, in the case of the COVID jabs, 50 percent of the deaths occur within 48 hours of injection.

It’s simply not conceivable that 10,000 people died two days after their shot from something other than the shot. It cannot all be coincidence.

Especially since so many of them are younger, with no underlying lethal conditions that threaten to take them out on any given day.

A full 80 percent have died within one week of their jab, which is still incredibly close in terms of temporality.

Children Risk Permanent Heart Damage

Aside from the immediate risk of death, children are also at risk for potentially lifelong health problems from the jab. Myocarditis (heart inflammation) has emerged as one of the most common problems, especially among boys and young men.

In early September 2021, Tracy Beth Hoeg and colleagues posted an analysis of VAERS data on the preprint server medRxiv, showing that more than 86 percent of the children aged 12 to 17 who report symptoms of myocarditis were severe enough to require hospitalization.

Cases of myocarditis explode after the second shot, Hoeg found, and disproportionally affect boys. A full 90% of post-jab myocarditis reports are males, and 85% of reports occurred after the second dose. According to Hoeg et. al.:

“The estimated incidence of CAEs [cardiac adverse events] among boys aged 12-15 years following the second dose was 162 per million; the incidence among boys aged 16-17 years was 94 per million. The estimated incidence of CAEs among girls was 13 per million in both age groups.”

Epidemiological Impact of COVID-19 Fully Vaccinated Population

by Dr. Joseph Mercola



Tawny Buettner, RN, worked in the Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit (CTICU) of a major children’s hospital in San Diego, California for more than 12 years.

Before the vaccine rollout, they’d see 4 or 5 myocarditis cases a year in the CTICU at the hospital where Tawny Buettner works that she was aware of.

In the last half of 2021, she is aware of 33 cases.

That’s an increase of over 10X in the rate of cases of myocarditis cases since the vaccines rolled out.

Not only that, the troponin levels of the kids were extremely high, from the teens to up to the 30’s. Note that after a heart attack your troponin levels might hit 5 and then return to normal after a few days. So these troponin levels were elevated by something more extreme than a heart attack. Those levels can stay elevated for months. Troponin is released when the heart is damaged.

The increased rate of myocarditis cases and excessive troponin levels didn’t happen by chance. It only started after the COVID vaccines rolled out.




Open Letter with Notice of Legal Obligations and Potential Liabilities to anyone Advocating or Administering COVID-19 Vaccines to Children


This letter is addressed to Public Officers in both their personal and professional capacities. It notifies them of their legal duties to any children in their care, in their capacity as a teacher, healthcare professional, public office holder, carer or parent, and the potential legal position should they breach those duties. It refers to any and all harms caused by decisions that they have made or complied with pertaining to COVID-19 vaccinations for children.

We are encouraging members of the public to distribute this letter as required, to educate and inform all those who are participating in the Covid-19 vaccine rollout to children.




As of 6 February 2022, based on publicly available official UK and US data, all age groups under 50 years old are at greater risk of fatality after receiving a COVID-19 inoculation than an unvaccinated person is at risk of a COVID-19 death. All age groups under 80 years old have virtually no benefit from receiving a COVID-19 inoculation, and the younger ages incur significant risk.

You can read the full paper here:



COVID-19 Vaccines” for Children in the UK: A Tale of Establishment Corruption by Senior Lecturer in International Relations, University of Lincoln


The actions taken by policy makers are juxtaposed to scientific evidence available showing that there has never been any rational justification for the mass rollout of “COVID-19 vaccines” to children. The rollout has been predicated on shifting narratives, obfuscations, faux justifications, outright lies, regulatory capture of supposed guardians of the public interest, and mass propaganda. Evidence of  actual and potential injuries to children has accumulated from before the beginning of  the rollout, in spite of  repeated attempts to cover it up, and yet, the under-12s are now also in the crosshairs and children are being targeted for “booster shots.” A clear picture emerges of collusion and corruption at the highest levels enforcing through an agenda that runs contrary to public health, democracy, and freedom. It is becoming clear that the rollout to children has nothing to do with “SARS-CoV-2”and everything to do with ongoing efforts to refashion the international monetary system in the image of central bank digital currencies and biometric IDs. In pursuit of that agenda, the transnational ruling class has revealed that it is willing to maim and kill children knowingly, creating enormous potential for a backlash as the public becomes aware of what is being done.



This is the HART statement on the use of Covid vaccines for children

HART is a group of highly qualified UK doctors, scientists, economists, psychologists and other academic experts. www.hartgroup.org

COVID-19 vaccines are not licensed for use in children. The JCVI advises that only those
children at very high risk of exposure and serious outcomes, such as older children with
severe neuro-disabilities that require residential care, should be offered vaccination, with
clear explanation to parents on the paucity of safety data.56
Given the rapid completion of vaccination of all high-risk groups, it is extremely
concerning to hear of a possible rollout to children later this year. In so doing, we are
entering into very questionable ethical terrain.

The main concerns are as follows:

● All the vaccine trials have specifically excluded children. Effects of the vaccine on
children are therefore completely unknown.
● The vaccines being rolled out have only limited short-term safety data and no
long-term safety data available.

● Known, potential, late-onset effects from vaccines that have not yet been ruled out
include adverse immune response to infection, neurological disorders, autoimmune
disease and pregnancy related problems which could take months or years to
become apparent.
● Pfizer-BioNtech and Moderna vaccines involve completely new mRNA vaccine
technology which has never previously been given to a large population.
● AstraZeneca, while involving a standard delivery method, still involves presenting DNA
fragments to the host cell which will then be taken up by the host to programme for
spike protein production rather than the more traditional whole virus or viral protein
technologies.  The recent suspension of this vaccine in over a dozen countries over
blood clot fears is cause for concern.
● Children are at extremely low risk from COVID-19 and no previously healthy child
under has died.  In context, COVID-19 accounted for 0.54% of all childhood deaths
in the UK and 6 other countries over the last 12 months.  Around 30-50% of children
remain asymptomatic and admissions to hospital or intensive care are uncommon.
● a small number of children have been reported with Paediatric Inflammatory
Multiorgan Syndrome but the vast majority have made a full recovery.
● It has been suggested that a very small number of children may develop ‘Long Covid’,
however given the unknown risks of adverse events from vaccination, this is not a
reason to proceed.
● Children are also much less likely than adults to transmit the virus, indeed living or
working with young children reduces the risk of severe disease. Therefore the
argument of ‘protecting others’ is not applicable.
● Limited UK trials on children are designed to look at the immune response with only
300 participants. This trial cannot assure long term safety.


For all of the reasons cited above, it would be highly unethical to vaccinate children who
are at such low risk from COVID-19. Any potentially long-term negative outcomes from
vaccination are especially important for children, for whom so many more years lie ahead
and whose immune and neurological systems are still developing.

Commencing research in children, in advance of published adult long-term safety data,
could be in breach of the Nuremberg Code.69 We need not look far back into history to
remember the devastating harms a rushed-to-market vaccination can have. Over 1,000
children were permanently disabled with narcolepsy caused by the Pandemrix Swine Flu
vaccine. Rapid rollout of a new vaccine for Dengue fever resulted in the deaths of 10
children in the Philippines, not at the time of the vaccination but months later when they
next encountered the Dengue virus. To repeat any such mistakes here would be
unforgivable. The immune system is phenomenally complex and still poorly understood.
Experimenting on young children for a disease that carries vanishingly small risks is a road
no ethical scientist should walk down. It is a clear departure from the precautionary
principle and the scientific experts at HART strongly advise against it.


The article below is from the American Institute Economic Research

Why are We Vaccinating Children against Covid-19?

“We also know that masks can be potentially dangerous to children. In terms of children and Covid-19, we know children do not transmit Covid-19 virus and that the concept of asymptomatic spread has been questioned severely, particularly for children. Children, if infected, just do not spread Covid-19 to others readily, either to other children, other adults in their families or otherwise, nor to their teachers. This was demonstrated elegantly in a study performed in the French Alps. The paediatric literature is settled science on this.

Not only is there an absence of evidence supporting the notion that children spread Covid-19 virus in any meaningful way, but there is direct evidence showing that they simply do not spread this disease! This has been shown in school settings and as published in other papers. Children typically, if infected, have asymptomatic illness. It is well-noted that asymptomatic cases are not the drivers of the pandemic; something particularly important in relation to children as they’re generally asymptomatic.

In this regard it is evident that neither children (nor asymptomatic adults) are the key drivers of SARS-CoV-2. In the rare cases where a child is infected with SARS-CoV-2, it is exceptionally rare for the child to get severely ill or die. And to reiterate, teachers are not at risk of transmission from children and schools are to be reopened immediately with no restrictions. They should have never remained closed and we knew this for one year now. The pediatric literature suggests that this is now settled science. Yet it seems that the ‘television’ medical experts and prominent US agency representatives, as well as government advisors and bureaucrats either do not read the science, do not understand the science, do not ‘get’ it, are blinded to it, or are just ignorant to the data and science. Most of what we have just stated we have known for one year now. This is not ‘new’ evidence, this has been settled for one year now, and certainly since last fall 2020. 

For nearly all children under 20 years of age the risks from getting Covid-19 are exceedingly small and for children the risk is basically near zero in this population— it is the closest to zero we can get to — the cost-benefit argument against using an essentially untested vaccine is heavily in favour of risk and virtually no benefit. The potential risk of unknown and serious side effects from the brand-new and barely tested vaccines are — in truth — completely unknown.  That’s because it is almost unheard of for a vaccine to be released to the public this quickly.

We already know that there is no emergency in children regarding Covid-19. And so why would Moderna Inc. seek to trial this vaccine on children with a death rate in this group of 0.003%

This really is a question of risk-management and parents must seriously consider that Covid-19 is a far less dangerous illness for children than influenza. Parents must be brave and be willing to assess this purely from a benefit versus risk position and ask themselves: ‘If my child has little if any risk, near zero risk of severe sequelae or death, and thus no benefit from the vaccine, yet there could be potential harms and as yet unknown harms from the vaccine (as already reported in adults who have received the vaccines), then why would I subject my child to such a vaccine?’ And in the presence of the potential risks, as well as the fact that a vaccine for Covid-19 is simply not indicated in children, why would a loving parent allow their child to be vaccinated with still-experimental vaccines? The children should live normally, and if exposed to SARS-CoV-2 we can rest assured that in the vast majority of cases, they will have no to only mild symptoms while at the same time developing naturally acquired immunity, and harmlessly; an immunity that is definitely superior to that which might be caused by a vaccine. This approach would also accelerate the development of the much needed herd immunity about which much has been written. Vaccinating our children with a possibly harmful (untested) vaccine to them and with no basis given their risk profile, must be pushed back upon hard by parents. Parents are the voices of their children now on vaccinating their children and on the other looming disaster, Covid-19 ‘vaccine passports,’ that are as illogical and dangerous as vaccines for children under 12! Americans must stand up now to this!”  by Paul E Alexander MSc PhD, McMaster University and GUIDE Research Methods Group, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada and Howard C. Tenenbaum DDS, Dip. Perio., PhD, FRCD(C) Centre for Advanced Dental Research and Care, Mount Sinai Hospital, and Faculties of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada - https://www.aier.org/article/why-are-we-vaccinating-children-against-covid-19/


Everything that the general public have not been told about vaccines.  The information in the video below is kept from the general public. Parents should watch the video below about children and vaccines.



Why can't anyone explain how these 14 kids died after getting vaccinated?

On July 16, 2021, the CDC looked into the deaths of 14 kids in VAERS who died after vaccination. Their deaths are still unexplained to this day. If it wasn't the vaccine, what killed those kids?



12-Year-Old Child Dies Two Days after Taking Pfizer Vaccine in Germany – Officials Pull Back on Mandatory Shots for Children


7-Year-Old Girl Has Stroke and Brain Haemorrhage 7 Days After Pfizer COVID-19 Shot


Louisiana Nurse Blows the Whistle: “We Have Had More Children Die From The COVID Vaccine Than Of COVID Itself”



Over 500 independent Canadian doctors, scientists, and health care practitioners from the Canadian Covid Care Alliance show in the presentation below that the Covid vaccines do more harm than good.


Observations From An Experienced Nurse About The COVID Vaccines



The Truth about Vaccine-Induced Myocarditis



UK Govt Advised To End Child Covid Vaccination


Triple/Double Vaccinated account for 89% of all Covid-19 Cases in over 18’s in England over the past 4 weeks according to latest data


A List of People Who Had Their Leg Amputated Shortly after Receiving COVID-19 Vaccine


Over One Thousand Scientific Studies Prove That the COVID-19 Vaccines Are Dangerous, and All Those Pushing This Agenda Are Committing the Indictable Crime of Gross Misconduct in Public Office.



New Study Shows an Increase In Deaths In 145 Countries After COVID Vaccines Were Introduced.



How safe are covid 'vaccines'?



10 Key Facts That Unravel the COVID Narrative